Quick question. I think we are good but wanted other opinions as it is not what we typically do. Building is from perhaps the late 60's. 5 floors. Ground floor is retail and restaurant and have their own restrooms that serve those uses. The upper 4 floors are all office use. Owner is proposing remodel of all common area restrooms on the office levels. The restroom footprints will be enlarged to provide full accessibility, but the total area available for restrooms is bound by electrical rooms.
If I calculate minimum plumbing fixtures by floor where I can only fit 3 WC's in the women's room I would be required to have 4 WC's. not possible. (56 women occupants)
If I calculate minimum plumbing fixtures by the gross area of the 4 floors that would require 11 WC's. I can provide 12 spread out on the 4 floors (3 on each floor) so that would satisfy the minimum plumbing fixture calculations. There would be an accessible WC on each floor.
I have no issue with the men's calculations.
I do not see any code language that would require the minimum fixtures be calculated on a per floor basis. The language in CBC 422.0 is "provided for the type of building occupancy". Accessibility language indicates you can circulate to other floors for the accessible restrooms, which would not be required.
I really think this is typical for calculating entire buildings, and this is an accepted method.
But I would like to know if I am overlooking something? Thank you.
If I calculate minimum plumbing fixtures by floor where I can only fit 3 WC's in the women's room I would be required to have 4 WC's. not possible. (56 women occupants)
If I calculate minimum plumbing fixtures by the gross area of the 4 floors that would require 11 WC's. I can provide 12 spread out on the 4 floors (3 on each floor) so that would satisfy the minimum plumbing fixture calculations. There would be an accessible WC on each floor.
I have no issue with the men's calculations.
I do not see any code language that would require the minimum fixtures be calculated on a per floor basis. The language in CBC 422.0 is "provided for the type of building occupancy". Accessibility language indicates you can circulate to other floors for the accessible restrooms, which would not be required.
I really think this is typical for calculating entire buildings, and this is an accepted method.
But I would like to know if I am overlooking something? Thank you.