Re: Movement to Remove Prescriptive Regulations for Sprinklers
Personally I see sprinklers as 'plan B', be it in Residential or Commercial.
'Plan A' used to be compartmentalization, supplemented by 'plan B' (sprinklers) to protect the contents of the affected compartment (as well as the remainder of the building). Up until 2003, New York State had NO provisions for non-seperated uses; NOR did we allow ANY mixed use in type V construction - fire wall or forget it!
Enter the dawn of a new age... the I-Codes based book collection.
Now we have non-seperated uses, to keep us on a level playing field with the rest of the country. :?:
Now we have mixed uses in type V construction, to keep us on a level playing field with the rest of the country. :?:
If we were still building with compartments - properly constructed compartments - the idea of sprinklers causing excessive water damage would be moot. Properly contructed compartmentalized buildings would limit the amount of water damage to other parts of the building, inherently by design. :!:
But that's just crazy talk...
EVERYONE knows that what I'm suggesting would reduce profit margins substantially. Wouldn't want the greedy to make less on a building, now would we?
Still sitting on my fence...
Still trying to decide which way to go... :?
Still think there's got to be a better way... :roll: