• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Nec 230.72

Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
1,554
Location
Miami Fla
I have an issue thats bugging me. I'm installing a new service disco that has been through 3 revisions and 2 plans reviews. First set of plans had a 400A shunt trip main as this disco is outside directly behind 2 existing 600A mains inside. I would have placed the EPO between the two 600's inside.

Latest approved set of plans now has me installing a 400A fusible main outside. This morning I was telling the GC he would be receiving an E-mail from me explaining that this is a violation of 230.72. He is questioning this so I pull out the book and read this aloud. A lay-man standing with us points to the corner of the building and says, "Whats the problem, they are all grouped on that corner of the building?".

I believe most of us here would agree that even having to walk a dozen steps outside to open the 3rd disco in not grouped, just throwing this out there as it did pass plans review.

The following is a pic of the service. The two existing 600a mains are directly behind what you see here. (The breaker enclosure is coming down tomorrow and being replaced with the fusible disco)



DSCN2113.jpg


Reply With Quote

Today 06:18 PM #2
 
What the GC and the passerby think is not relevant. It's what the inspector thinks.
 
* * * *

Agree with 480sparky!......IMO, "grouped together" does not mean ' ...some inside

and some outside '!.....Was the picture of the installation shown, the one drawn

on the "passed" plans review?







Chris,



For us electrical novices, please explain the "fusible disco" install outside.

Which Articles are applicable? Thanks!



* * * *
 
Let me first say this work is extremely neat & workmanlike. You positively have the skills of a true electrical professional.

I too do not believe this particular arrangement would be considered "grouped". That being said, it may be possible to get special permission for this installation if considerable substaniation or circumstance could be explianed as to why this arrangement is necessary and can be made safe.

For example, lets say the electrical room simply has no more room for new equipment. If the occupancy in question is under single management with qualified in-house employees & permanent placards are placed on the service enclosures identifying the location of the other service disconnecting means, then maybe, just maybe this could be approved.

If the only reason for this arrangement is beacuse it is easier to install or the engineer doesn't know what he is doing, then I would likely hold to the letter of the code.
 
north star said:
* * * *For us electrical novices, please explain the "fusible disco" install outside.

Which Articles are applicable? Thanks!
I don't understanding what you are asking here. The new fusable disco is 230.70 compliant.???

Bryan Holland said:
Let me first say this work is extremely neat & workmanlike. You positively have the skills of a true electrical professional.
I thank you sir, that was very nice.
 
Update

I had the EI out today to look at this, I didn't bring up 230.72 during our conversation. He told me to wire it up, call him back and he would release it to POCO.

FWIW, here is a pic of the breaker enclosure changed out to the fusible disco as per revision 3.

DSCN2124.jpg
 
Just keep these two administrative provisions in mind:

104.1 General. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this code. The building official shall have the authority to render interpretations of this code and to adopt policies and procedures in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies and procedures shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of this code. Such policies and procedures shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this code.
110.1 General. Construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official and such construction or work shall remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Inspections presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes. Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection.
In short, the building department / inspectors do not have the authority to overlook ANY provision of the code. In the event a code violation results in a hazard or accident, the building department / inspectors can't & won't be found liable. The contractor, however, can & will...

104.8 Liability. The building official, member of the board of appeals or employee charged with the enforcement of this code, while acting for the jurisdiction in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by this code or other pertinent law or ordinance, shall not thereby be rendered liable personally and is hereby relieved from personal liability for any damage accruing to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties and under the provisions of this code shall be defended by legal representative of the jurisdiction until the final termination of the proceedings. The building official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of this code.
 
Back
Top