jar546
CBO
How many code sections can you think of that will address this as a violation?
Any?
Any?
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Great calls Chris.raider1 said:110.14(B) requires all splicing devices to be covered with an insulation equivalent to that of the conductors.310.4(A) does not permit conductors smaller than 1/0 to be paralelled so the apparent bare #10 could not be doubled over to try to achieve a larger size.
Chris
My thoughts exactly!Pcinspector1 said:What is the electrican trying to do ? Why could'nt the white braided netural be installed in the same lug, was the lug striped or wire too large?
Correct, a new section in the 2002 NEC, 408.21, required that grounded conductors must terminate in a a single lug.jim baird said:I think it was the '02 NEC that said the neutral terminal is not to share a lug with any other conductor.One electrician I flagged for more than one neutral on a lug told me he had seen panel enclosures that stated on a sticker that two neutrals would be OK under one lug.
IMHO, 408.41 would not allow you to install new circuits to the panelboard and have more than 1 grounded (Neutral) conductor installed under the lug even if the sticker in the panel permits it.Pcinspector1 said:raider1,So if a sticker in a panelbox enclosure states that more than one neutral is allowed in a lug, like Jim states an electrican told him, would you be allowed to continue adding additional circuits, using the lugs that are not doubled up? Or does 408.41 apply to the existing panelbox enclosure?
Thanks for your insight!