• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

new tower coming

BSSTG

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Messages
729
Location
Seadrift, Tx.
Greetings all,

I'll be getting a permit app for a new tower. In reading 3108 of the 09 IBC it states that it is to be compliant with TIA 222. I would think that folks that design these things are fluent with all of this and that if a P.E. stamps the dwgs and states they are compliant with this standard that they should be good to go.

thoughts? this is another new territory for me.

thanks

BSSTG
 
Sounds about right.....If you are not going to review their calcs, you need to make sure they used the proper design values.....we also have a State amendment that might consider that a "treshold" structure requiring peer review of the primary structural elements....

And I don't know about wind and ice where you are, but big concerns here...

106.1.5 Threshold limits. For the purposes of this section, the term “threshold limit” shall apply to any proposed structure or addition thereto: (1) having four stories; (2) 60 feet in height; (3) with a clear span of 150 feet in width; (4) containing 150,000 square feet of total gross floor area; or (5) with an occupancy of 1,000 persons.

106.1.5.1 Requirements for proposed structures or additions that exceed the threshold limits. Pursuant to section 29-276b of the Connecticut General Statutes, if a proposed structure or addition to an existing structure will exceed the threshold limit set forth in Section 106.1.5 of this code, the building official of the municipality in which the structure or addition will be located shall require that an independent structural engineering consultant review the structural plans and design specifications of the structure or addition to be constructed to determine compliance with the requirements of this code to the extent necessary to assure the stability and integrity of the primary structural support systems of such structure or addition. Any modifications of approved structural plans or design specifications shall require shop drawings to the extent necessary to determine compliance with the requirements of this code and shall be reviewed by such consultant. Any fees relative to such review requirements shall be paid by the owner of the proposed building project.

If a structure or addition exceeds the threshold limit, the architect of record, professional engineer of record responsible for the design of the structure or addition and the general contractor shall sign a statement of professional opinion affirming that the completed construction is in substantial compliance with the approved plans and design specifications. If fabricated structural load-bearing members or assemblies are used in the construction, the professional engineer responsible for the design of such members or assemblies shall sign a statement of professional opinion affirming that the completed fabrication is in substantial compliance with the approved design specifications.

The building official of the municipality in which the structure or addition will be located shall satisfy himself that each architect, professional engineer, including each professional

engineer responsible for the design of fabricated structural load-bearing members or assemblies, general contractor and major subcontractor involved in the project holds a license to engage in the work or occupation for which the appropriate building permit has been issued.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We had a 160' monopole put up recently, where the PE of record was from out of state.

I sent the plans to our consultant SE/PE for review. Ours found that local soil conditions had not been property considered, resulting in a significant foundation re-design.

I'm a big fan of using consultants when a project exceeds my review abilities. Our Code allows for consultant fees to be passed through to the applicant.

mj
 
Bet you can see that from Indiana!....We have alot of issues with out-of-staters....usually miss rain on snow surcharge...

mjesse said:
We had a 160' monopole put up recently, where the PE of record was from out of state.I sent the plans to our consultant SE/PE for review. Ours found that local soil conditions had not been property considered, resulting in a significant foundation re-design.

I'm a big fan of using consultants when a project exceeds my review abilities. Our Code allows for consultant fees to be passed through to the applicant.

mj
 
For those of us in the 2012 IBC, be aware that the design must be based on TIA 222-G. T-222 F is no longer acceptable due to the change in section 3108.1.

GPE
 
Back
Top