JimmyTreeX
GREENHORN
Hello All,
I want to start by saying (again) how great it is to have a forum like this to be able to ask questions and get answers/perspectives from other inspectors. I’m sure most of you go through the same thing as I do, which is working with superiors who have only done things one way and they hate the thought of change. Even after working as a code inspector for 17 years, I still have so many questions. Today I wanted to ask about no hot water:
We often run into this, sometimes it’s accidental, sometimes it’s obvious that the owner did it maliciously (although we can rarely prove that). So we cite the owner and demand that the hot water be restored within 3 days (we tell them to get it repaired immediately, but we give an official 3 day notice). If they don’t, our process has been to ticket the owner and declare the dwelling unfit for human habitation to be vacated in 3 days. This is how our office has dealt with this since I started 17 years ago.
Well a couple years ago I started realizing that yes, hot water is essential, but it’s not life threatening. They also still have water, so they still have their toilets, etc. So I figured having cold water and a place to live is better than cold water and getting put out on the street in 3 days. I do still agree that the dwelling is not fit for habitation, but I think we should be giving people the option of up to 30 days before vacating. It’s not their fault that they don’t have hot water (most of the time… non-payment for gas is a different story, mainly because the power would most likely be shut off too).
So my questions is: how long would you/do you give a tenant without hot water? How do you handle these situations? Sometimes the owner is ok with paying the fine if it means they get to vacate the tenant, so enforcement is ineffective. I just wanted to get another take on the situation.
Thank you.
I want to start by saying (again) how great it is to have a forum like this to be able to ask questions and get answers/perspectives from other inspectors. I’m sure most of you go through the same thing as I do, which is working with superiors who have only done things one way and they hate the thought of change. Even after working as a code inspector for 17 years, I still have so many questions. Today I wanted to ask about no hot water:
We often run into this, sometimes it’s accidental, sometimes it’s obvious that the owner did it maliciously (although we can rarely prove that). So we cite the owner and demand that the hot water be restored within 3 days (we tell them to get it repaired immediately, but we give an official 3 day notice). If they don’t, our process has been to ticket the owner and declare the dwelling unfit for human habitation to be vacated in 3 days. This is how our office has dealt with this since I started 17 years ago.
Well a couple years ago I started realizing that yes, hot water is essential, but it’s not life threatening. They also still have water, so they still have their toilets, etc. So I figured having cold water and a place to live is better than cold water and getting put out on the street in 3 days. I do still agree that the dwelling is not fit for habitation, but I think we should be giving people the option of up to 30 days before vacating. It’s not their fault that they don’t have hot water (most of the time… non-payment for gas is a different story, mainly because the power would most likely be shut off too).
So my questions is: how long would you/do you give a tenant without hot water? How do you handle these situations? Sometimes the owner is ok with paying the fine if it means they get to vacate the tenant, so enforcement is ineffective. I just wanted to get another take on the situation.
Thank you.