Alias
REGISTERED
Interesting take on new Green vs old historic.
Sue
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =123861278
Sue
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =123861278
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
¹ http://www.megwhitman.com/california_fo ... osts#forumMeg Whitman site said:Meg:Accept the resignations of the entire Building Standards Commission, appoint a new commission that rolls back their adoption of the new building code, Arnold did it when he was elected and got rid of a bad code, his commission is about to adopt a new bad code that will kill jobs, it is the work of commercial interests promoting their products. The Green Building Code is a disaster, it is to take effect Jan 1st, areas that have voluntarily adopted it have homes so toxic that people can't live in them without getting sick, Los Altos is one such city. "Green" has to be completely rethought, "green" is now synonymous with toxic as it stands, the Energy Code effective last August 1st in insane, it is the office building "sick building syndrome" all over again but this time in homes, it seals up homes then pumps air back into them creating 50% more energy use than before the code was adopted. We don't need "green jobs", we need real jobs.¹
Inspectors are making people sick by enforcing codes!Sierra Club said:Air Quality Like Katrina TrailersA 2005 statewide study of residential ventilation and indoor air quality found that new homes in California have very little natural ventilation (around 0.1 air change per hour). Unless windows are opened daily, formaldehyde can concentrate to unhealthy levels. My 2009 study of new, unoccupied South Bay homes showed formaldehyde levels that can cause illness. Homes in San Jose and surrounding communities typically had formaldehyde levels between 30 and 80 ppb. Compare this to the 27 ppb recommended by GreenPoint Rated. Homes in Los Altos typically had formaldehyde between 60 and 120 ppb. Compare this to the median formaldehyde level in the infamous Hurricane Katrina FEMA trailers: 79 ppb.¹
Inspectors are making people sick by enforcing codes!conarb said:Sue up in the far north:An industrial hygienist named Linda Kinkaid is leading the fight down there. here is something on her, I talk to here frequently ow and have retained her for the new home I'm trying to permit down in Saratoga.
Sierra Club said:Air Quality Like Katrina TrailersA 2005 statewide study of residential ventilation and indoor air quality found that new homes in California have very little natural ventilation (around 0.1 air change per hour). Unless windows are opened daily, formaldehyde can concentrate to unhealthy levels. My 2009 study of new, unoccupied South Bay homes showed formaldehyde levels that can cause illness. Homes in San Jose and surrounding communities typically had formaldehyde levels between 30 and 80 ppb. Compare this to the 27 ppb recommended by GreenPoint Rated. Homes in Los Altos typically had formaldehyde between 60 and 120 ppb. Compare this to the median formaldehyde level in the infamous Hurricane Katrina FEMA trailers: 79 ppb.¹