• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Oakland Again

conarb

conarb

Registered User
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
3,505
Location
California East Bay Area
This is the 4th recent fire destroying a building under construction, the cities want mixed use to make money off the sales taxes, One Bay Area wants new high-rise apartments to pack the population into the urban core within walking/biking distance of mass transit to "save the planet" by getting people out of cars and single family homes, but the activists are anti-capitalist and anti-gentrification and are burning the buildings down:

East Bay Times said:
“
OAKLAND – The fourth suspicious fire at a large apartment or condominium complex in the Oakland and Emeryville area in the past 12 months ripped through a six-story building under construction early Friday, forcing 700 nearby residents to evacuate and escalating fears of arson.

The massive four-alarm fire broke out about 4:30 a.m. Friday, engulfing a mixed-use building at the corner of 23rd and Valdez streets, two blocks from Lake Merritt.

No one was injured but the fire left a construction crane teetering and unsteady, spurring the evacuation of several hundred residents for an unknown period until the crane can be dismantled.

Oakland has a housing crisis,” Mayor Libby Schaaf said at a news conference. “This is the type of development Oakland needs.” The mayor added that it was “miraculous” no one died.

And area residents, many of whom have expressed concerns about the increasing number of construction projects in their neighborhoods, echoed the same sentiment.

“I get that there are people upset about gentrification, and I am one of those, myself,” said Hollie Hardy, a local author and college instructor who lives near the burned building.

She’s watched as her artist and writer friends have been pushed out. After Wood Partners put her property up for sale, she said she and her neighbors have been worried that they, too, will be forced to leave their rent-controlled apartments. Hardy has been living in her building since 1997, she said.

Even with those fears, Hardy said burning these buildings down is not the answer.

“We need housing,” she said. “More apartments means cheaper rent, even if you can’t afford the luxury ones. Now, there is a pattern of arson of burning these buildings down, and it’s just really scary.”¹
Click to expand...

Bottom like is the activists want the old broken-down non-code compliant buildings to remain to keep rents low and provide cheap places to live for our large minority populations.



¹ http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/07/07/oakland-fire-four-alarm-blaze-at-downtown-construction-site/
 
Many Financial institutions require "risk insurance" prior to start. But not all. Most times the Project Developers will pull out the policy, sometimes the builder.
 
steveray said:
You would think these idiots would hire security for the site....But maybe they make a lot of money on the insurance claims...
Click to expand...
Yeah, like you'd think people would buy fire and life insurance so if they die in a fire everything would be covered, same goes for earthquake insurance, why spend all the money to earthquake-proof buildings when you could get a new building if the old one tumbles down?
 
linnrg said:
if the neighbors are the ones starting the fires I suspect the premiums to be sky high now in Oakland.
Click to expand...
It's not really neighbors, Oakland has large criminal activist groups, from various anticapitalist groups to bicycle activist groups, and black activist groups.

East Bay Times said:
OAKLAND — Is a single, determined arsonist behind four massive construction fires that have scorched the East Bay over the past year, including a four-alarm blaze in Oakland Friday morning?

Two developers who were victimized in the earlier fires said Monday they’re convinced there is a pattern of arson.

Federal officials added to the intrigue Monday by releasing a shocking video of a hooded figure putting on gloves and scaling an Emeryville construction project two months ago, then scurrying away just as it bursts into flames. They described the figure as a “person of interest” in their investigation.

“I definitely think this is arson,” developer Rick Holliday said Monday of the latest blaze. “I think it’s the same person or group. The means and methods of setting the fire fits the exact pattern of both of my fires.” Holliday is developer of an Emeryville project that has been torched twice.

“I strongly believe that there is a person(s) setting these fires for political reasons,” Holliday said, adding that details of the Emeryville fires and the latest Oakland blaze are quite similar.

The Emeryville fires both started in the same stairwell in the center of the development, Holliday said. While few details of Friday’s Oakland fire have been released publicly, the fire chief said the first arriving fire crews found flames coming from the center of the building construction.

So far, Singer said, that same hooded individual has not been spotted in video footage of Friday’s fire so far.

“To my knowledge, the bicyclist has not been spotted yet in the video footage,” Singer said. “There is a lot more footage to review and we do not have access to all the footage that the authorities are reviewing.”

Authorities have said the similarities between all these fires concern them, but they have not determined if Friday’s blaze is suspicious. All the projects had varying levels of security at the construction sites, including cameras.

A frustrated Holliday, who has vowed to rebuild, said he has received no updates on his latest fire.

“They are still in active phase of sorting out leads,” he said.

Magganas, who has just started rebuilding his development, said the city of Oakland has created a “bureaucratic situation” that is fueling the problem by not allowing construction to continue at night when the arsonist has struck.

“We know security doesn’t quite do it, because all of these places had security,” Magganas said. “It takes more live beings, organisms being around to deter people.”

He said he understands construction noise would have to be stopped overnight, but there would be ways to keep workers there to keep buildings safe.

The city did not immediately respond to inquiries, but Singer said there were no issues and the Alta Waverly project had even been allowed to work on Saturdays.¹
Click to expand...

If you play the video in the link below you will see a black, hooded man climbing the scaffolding and riding away on a bicycle. Security doesn't work and contractors are proposing being allowed to work around the clock so there are always men there to spot suspicious individuals.

We should start prosecuting all of these activist groups under the RICO laws, these groups are far more dangerous than the Mafia was that the RICO laws were written to prosecute.


¹ http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/07...-arsonist-responsible-for-construction-fires/
 
I wonder if with so many activist groups around here if contractors should try to get concealed carry permits, they are hard to get but with so much anti-contractor activity I wonder if it would make sense. What about you guys in states that allow concealed carry, is it worthwhile?
 
not that unusual for me to see a gun on the residential job sites. Some State fire marshals up here carry (the ones set up for investigations).

Outside of work I see lots of open carry - if that is so then I assume there are just as many that are "concealed".
 
Being from the land of lots of guns, but you can only have them in your vehicle for hunting or the range, this thread has got a little extreme for me...
 
tmurray said:
Being from the land of lots of guns, but you can only have them in your vehicle for hunting or the range, this thread has got a little extreme for me...
Click to expand...
What are builders supposed to do when their buildings are being burned down and the cities direct the cops to "stand-down" when activist groups are involved? Look at Berkeley recently, the cops stood and watched as bused-in activists attacked people, finally using cellphone pictures autistic guys on 4Chan were able to pin the bike-lock attacker to a philosophy professor at a local junior college, he has been arrested and is going to be tried but he's one fo those public employees teaching our youth.

BTW, I personally don't own or like guns, what I would do is hire a 24/7 armed guard service were I to even try to build in those areas, as a matter fo fact I built a few apartment buildings in the area of the last fire in the 60s with no problems, and of course those additional costs would ultimately be passed on the the renters, and Oakland's biggest problem is housing the poor.
 
The police need to understand they are employed to do a job. Politicians cannot tell them when to do and when not to do their job. They can certainly provide some guidance on matters of policy, but cannot ask them to do something that is openly negligent or outright illegal.

It sounds to me like the police departments have weak leadership. Whether the groups are left or right leaning makes no difference. If they break the law they should be arrested. I'm young and generally pretty progressive and liberal in my ideology. I would never agree with action that damages someone else's property or harms another individual. No matter the circumstances. Those people should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. And I would expect the same from people who have more conservative ideology. I think the issue becomes an "us versus them" idea to some people where the opposing political faction is labeled the enemy. "Everything they do is bad. Everything we do is good." People seem to forget that both sides are putting forward ideas that they think will better society and in that we all want the same thing. We can all denounce radicals attacking people or destroying property without loosing face for our viewpoints.
 
T Murray:

Here in the "progressive" Bay Area police departments are being ordered to stand down and not go after the so-called anarchists, I mentioned once before our mass transit problems, this is particularly important here because building departments are the vehicle used to force development into the urban cores, and especially at mass transit stations. As I reported before black thugs have been invading BART trains attacking and robbing people, BART has it's own police force and they are doing nothing about it, they are trying to coverup the fact that the criminals are black and there is a huge controversy now about the coverups,
Hot Air said:
Over the last few months, several attacks by large groups have targeted riders on San Francisco’s Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) trains, resulting in robberies and injuries. The first of these took place in April and involved as many as sixty youth and seven victims, two of whom were beaten. The two most recent came at the end of June, including an armed robbery with a knife and another incident with a dozen perpetrators robbing a woman.

BART riders have begun to fear for their safety, and want video released to see who are committing these robberies. BART won’t release the video, however, and BART board member Deborah Allen tells CBS that it’s because they are afraid that the videos will “unfairly affect and characterize riders of color”:
¹
Click to expand...

When these criminals invade the trains they jump over the turnstiles, BART came up with a plan to erect fences over the turnstiles but the bicycle activist groups went mad at meetings stating that they get their bikes onto the trains by holding them over their heads as they go through the turnstiles, in fact they are just putting into service new train cars and the handicap and bicycle activists have demanded most of the space so there are very few seats in the new cars reserving most space for wheelchairs and bicycles. Plan Bay Area is trying to mass everyone at urban cores in large multifamily developments within walking or biking distance from mass transit to get people out of their cars and private homes, the fact is that they aren't safe and as the activists become more emboldened the authorities are letting them get away with whatever they want.

Remember how Mark Handler was always making comments about politically correct terminology when referring to handicapped people? Apparently Canada has gone off the boards with political correctness, even making it law that you have to use pronouns describing people who don't know which sex they are, a Canadian psychology professor has refused to comply and has delivered the best opinion on the matter that I have ever read or heard, it's almost 3 hours but every minute of it is well worth the time, one thing he explains is social psychologists, I've read a lot of crap from them, and had to wonder what they were, I know of psychologists and sociologists but social psychologists is new to me, Professor Jordan Peterson of The University of Toronto explains that they make it up as they go along.

See, there are still some good Canadians!

¹ http://hotair.com/archives/2017/07/11/bart-withholding-video-attacks-concern-stereotypes/
 
CDA:

Nobody but Moonbeam wants that stupid railroad, the reason he wants it is the United Nations wants people out of cars and airplanes by the end of this century to save the fu¢king planet.

An update on the Oakland situation:

East Bay Times said:
OAKLAND — In what an expert calls a “huge failure,” hundreds of residential and commercial buildings across Oakland were never inspected after firefighters flagged fire dangers and referred them for followup, including more than 200 apartment buildings housing thousands of residents, an investigation by the Bay Area News Group has found.

Records acquired from the city covering 2011 until early this year show that firefighters referred 879 properties for fire code issues to the Bureau of Fire Prevention, a number that includes the apartment buildings, plus commercial buildings and several schools.

But 615 (79 percent) of the properties flagged for referral were never inspected by the bureau, a cross-check of the data obtained through multiple public records requests show. Only 264 (21 percent) of the referred properties had subsequent inspections, and only a handful of them were conducted within the first month. It often took months or years before the visits occurred.

Grissom said safety wasn’t the bottom line. He sat in meetings where Oakland inspectors were told to give priority to higher-end buildings with modern or upgraded fire-prevention systems because property owners paid for those inspections.

Checking sprinklers and alarms are high-revenue generators for the department with strong likelihood of receiving payment, compared to rundown, older properties owned by people who cannot or will not pay, he said. California law allows departments to charge fees for routine inspections the state fire code requires they perform.¹
Click to expand...


¹ http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/07...er-warnings-of-unsafe-buildings-go-unchecked/
 
Last edited:
cda said:
I wonder how many buildings/ businesses they are suppose to inspect???

What is tha number ????
Click to expand...
It doesn't say, the interesting thing here is at least some of the rank and file firemen are doing their job, but once their complaints are filed they are kicked upstairs to the political appointees who could care less. It's also noteworthy that enforcement is diverted to money-making inspections and not real safety concerns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top