steveray
SAWHORSE
Honest mistake? Or does someone not want to put in sprinklers and voice evacuation fire alarm? (Required at 300 in CT)
-
Welcome to The Building Code Forum
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Occupant loading?
- Thread starter steveray
- Start date
north star
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,596
= = =
Did "someone" catch it on plans review and ask the RDP
for a corrected Occ. Load?
+ + +
Did "someone" catch it on plans review and ask the RDP
for a corrected Occ. Load?
+ + +
mark handler
SAWHORSE
It's that waiting area of 56 people, 16 percent of the total OL
More than many restaurant totals
More than many restaurant totals
steveray
SAWHORSE
Plans just came over the counter....Just wondering why they are showing 2 different numbers with the under 300 being big and bold.....
mark handler
SAWHORSE
I understand.
In CA it's a no brainer, it will be sprinkled
Gross area over 5,000 sq ft
In CA it's a no brainer, it will be sprinkled
Gross area over 5,000 sq ft
steveray
SAWHORSE
Upon closer inspection, it will be sprinklered.... (we have the 5000 Ftsq also)...which they have proposed....just not sure why they have 2 different occ loads within 3" on the plans....not time for review yet, messed up application and statement of special inspections, boss is sending it back....along with the $22K check...mark handler said: