steveray
SAWHORSE
Honest mistake? Or does someone not want to put in sprinklers and voice evacuation fire alarm? (Required at 300 in CT)
-
Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades
Occupant loading?
- Thread starter steveray
- Start date
north star
Sawhorse
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,596
= = =
Did "someone" catch it on plans review and ask the RDP
for a corrected Occ. Load?
+ + +
Did "someone" catch it on plans review and ask the RDP
for a corrected Occ. Load?
+ + +
mark handler
SAWHORSE
It's that waiting area of 56 people, 16 percent of the total OL
More than many restaurant totals
More than many restaurant totals
steveray
SAWHORSE
Plans just came over the counter....Just wondering why they are showing 2 different numbers with the under 300 being big and bold.....
mark handler
SAWHORSE
I understand.
In CA it's a no brainer, it will be sprinkled
Gross area over 5,000 sq ft
In CA it's a no brainer, it will be sprinkled
Gross area over 5,000 sq ft
steveray
SAWHORSE
Upon closer inspection, it will be sprinklered.... (we have the 5000 Ftsq also)...which they have proposed....just not sure why they have 2 different occ loads within 3" on the plans....not time for review yet, messed up application and statement of special inspections, boss is sending it back....along with the $22K check...mark handler said: