D
DwightB
Guest
The more I read codes, the more I begin to question my assumptions. I've always assumed that if there is a fire wall, then there is a portion of the building that does not have the required perimeter access. For instance, assuming a square building, with code compliant clear distance all the way around, so that F=P, I can have (1-.25) x allowable area. But suppose the building is twice as wide, with a firewall down the middle. I've always assumed my accessible perimeter is now only 75% (3 of the 4 sides) and the increase is now (.75-.25) x allowable area.
Is that correct?
Is that correct?