• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Permits, Inspections, and the Forgotten Purpose of the Building Code

The purpose of building permits and inspections has never been about bureaucracy or red tape. It’s about life safety, property protection, and accountability. Every section of the building code exists because somewhere, at some point, something went terribly wrong. Yet despite this, there are still property owners and contractors who question the need for oversight.

History proves that when work goes unchecked, corners get cut and when corners get cut, people can die. Building codes represent the minimum standard, not the gold standard, and permits paired with inspections are the only way to ensure those minimums are met. The goal of this article is to highlight how real-world tragedies, legal battles, and systemic failures prove the need for rigorous code enforcement and public awareness.

When Oversight Fails: A Brief History of Tragedy

Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse (Kansas City, 1981)
114 people were killed when two suspended walkways collapsed due to a design change that was never properly reviewed or inspected.
Lesson: Field modifications without oversight can lead to catastrophic structural failures.

Surfside Condo Collapse (Florida, 2021)
98 people died when the Champlain Towers South collapsed. Deferred maintenance, known structural issues, and a lack of rigorous oversight were key contributors.
Lesson: Long-term safety depends on more than just initial construction. It requires persistent enforcement and accountability.

Berkeley Balcony Collapse (California, 2015)
Six people died due to a balcony failure caused by water intrusion and dry rot. The contractor reportedly used cheaper materials and cut corners on waterproofing.
Lesson: Code details matter, especially when hidden from view.

Ronan Point (UK, 1968)
This partial high-rise collapse due to a gas explosion and weak connections led to major building reforms in Britain.
Lesson: The way a building is assembled and how it’s inspected matters, especially under force.

Unpermitted Conversions and Fatal Fires (USA-wide)
Illegal garage apartments and makeshift units often lead to preventable fatalities due to lack of egress, smoke detection, or fire separation.
Lesson: Skipping the permit process often means skipping life safety requirements.

Litigation Trends: When Cutting Corners Ends in Court

Construction defect litigation has exploded in recent decades, often tracing back to a common thread: lack of oversight. Whether the work was unpermitted, poorly inspected, or performed by someone cutting corners, the legal aftermath is rarely cheap or quiet.

Residential construction defect claims cost builders and insurers over $5 billion annually in the United States. In states like Florida, Texas, and California, the number of lawsuits tied to unpermitted work and code violations continues to climb. In Florida, nearly 30 percent of property insurance claims in some years involved homes with undisclosed or unpermitted work that didn’t meet code. Water intrusion and structural deficiencies are the two most common root causes in defect claims, and both are directly tied to code compliance and inspection.

High-profile examples:

Millennium Tower (San Francisco)
A luxury high-rise began sinking and tilting. Permits were issued, but scrutiny during inspection was lacking. Settlements exceeded $100 million.

The Fontainebleau Las Vegas
A $3 billion project failed amid claims of substandard materials and plan deviations, leading to liens and lawsuits from dozens of subcontractors.

KB Home Settlements
One of the country’s largest builders settled multiple lawsuits related to framing, waterproofing, and installation defects. Many homes had passed inspections, but manufacturer instructions were ignored and timelines rushed.

Why Minimum Standards Matter

There’s a dangerous misconception that meeting minimum code is good enough to ensure a well-built structure. The truth is minimum standards are exactly that—minimums. They are the floor, not the ceiling. And without someone verifying that work meets that floor, there’s no protection at all.

Building codes don’t guarantee luxury, comfort, or longevity. They exist to prevent failure, injury, and death. And while many contractors operate with integrity, the industry also includes developers and builders motivated by speed and savings.

That’s not an attack. That’s a reality. The inspection process exists to ensure that code compliance is maintained even under pressure, not as a barrier to progress, but as a safeguard for the public.

Permits and Inspections: The Last Line of Defense

Most property owners assume that if they hire a licensed contractor, everything will be done right. But licensure alone doesn't guarantee quality. It doesn't guarantee code compliance. And it definitely doesn’t guarantee that corners won’t be cut. That’s where permits and inspections come in.

Permits create a public record of what's being built, when, and by whom. They allow for independent verification by professionals trained to enforce minimum safety standards. And inspections aren’t about catching people doing something wrong. They’re about confirming that things are being done right.

When work is done without permits, it often goes unseen until it fails. And when it fails, it’s not just about repairs. It often leads to litigation, insurance disputes, or even worse, loss of life.

This Isn’t Just My Job. It’s My Responsibility.

I’ve served as a Building Official, Inspector, and Plans Examiner in two different states, with over 40 years of experience in the construction industry. I’ve worked alongside contractors, engineers, architects, and tradespeople. I’ve seen the best of what the industry can produce, and I’ve seen the damage that can be done when corners are cut, permits are skipped, or inspections are treated like an inconvenience.

The work we do in this profession is about more than just code books and plan sets. It's about protecting people—residents, business owners, tenants, and visitors alike. When I'm reviewing a set of plans or walking a jobsite, I’m not just thinking about local ordinances. I’m thinking about the family that’s going to live in that house. The elderly person in that condo. The child swimming in that hotel pool.

Because this isn’t just about the towns we live in. It’s about the places we go. When you stay in a hotel while on vacation, you’re trusting that the roof won’t collapse. When you sit in a restaurant, you assume the mezzanine above you won’t fail. When your kids jump into a resort pool, you count on the system being properly grounded and safely constructed.

That trust exists because of the work we do. And if we don’t take it seriously, no one will.
 
KB Home Settlements
One of the country’s largest builders settled multiple lawsuits related to framing, waterproofing, and installation defects. Many homes had passed inspections, but manufacturer instructions were ignored and timelines rushed.
Many or all passed inspection? People hear the names of major residential developers and assume that there is a consistent good quality product. The truth is that the local conditions dictate quality results. It is a local contractor that builds the houses and a local AHJ that inspects the houses. It's more of a crap shoot than people know.

I recently had a look at a finished dwelling in a tract of a few hundred. The average price is $1,500,00.00, so one would expect a quality build. I found about a dozen violations worth writing and I was approached by a pair of superintendents. They asked if I had any concerns to which I replied that yes, a few. Rather than waiting to find out about my concerns, one of them stated that the City inspector has already signed off the final inspection.... He went on to say that any concern of mine can't mean much as the City has the best inspectors that they have ever dealt with. And away they went. Six months after being occupied, the vaulted ceiling of a 18'W by 45'L room that held the kitchen, dining and family rooms split open at the exterior wall to ceiling intersection. The lady was home when it happened. She stated that there was a sound like a gunshot and then she saw the crack. That was the extent of the description that I received; I don't know the cause and have not seen it.

The developer has a nation wide footprint. They make wonderful signs. You would expect that Nirvana awaits you beyond the gate.
 
Last edited:
There's a well-known up-scale residential developer in the northeast that has done projects in the town where I live, and in the town where I currently work. Some years ago I stopped by my home town Building Department to chat with the building official, who was a friend. (Since passed away.) He told me the work of this well-known developer was the worst construction he had ever seen.

When people are determined to do everything as cheaply as possible, it's difficult (or impossible) to explain that the building code isn't a gold-plated standard, it's the absolute bare minimum.
 
the absolute bare minimum

I don’t think that is a fair assessment. Built to code is way more of everything than we did twenty years ago. If you meet today’s codes, the end result should be fine so referring to it as a bare minimum is disingenuous.
 
I don’t think that is a fair assessment. Built to code is way more of everything than we did twenty years ago. If you meet today’s codes, the end result should be fine so referring to it as a bare minimum is disingenuous.
But it is the minimum standard to build by. I know plenty of builders who have always overbuilt structurally on purpose. I know many electricians who put way more receptacles in than required because it makes sense. I've seen the same thing with insulation in the attic and the walls, and even R8 ductwork inside the thermal envelope. When you are part of a culture that provides a quality product, whether to solidify your reputation or simply want to make sure that what you build lasts, you quickly see how the codes are quite minimal, regardless of how 'over-engineered' some people think their span tables are, for example.

Not every region in the country is LA County.
 
Not every region in the country is LA County.
They just want to be. Growing up in a small town in Illinois farm country, the impression I had of California was all beach parties and suntanned Betty's.
 
Last edited:
Seems like the conversation has split into two topics:
1. Whether the current code is really a minimum standard, vs. a gold-plated version when compared to older versions of the code.
2. Whether the code is actually followed by the builder during construction.

If the answer to #2 is "no", then the answer to #1 is irrelevant.

I had a friend who was fresh out of school, going to work for a nationally-known home builder. He was sent out initially to do warranty repairs here in So Cal. First call was to a townhome that had experienced a roof leak above the master bedroom closet. That area had been designed as an equipment well. He climbed the ladder, expecting to spend some time up there tracing down the source. When he popped out of the hatch, he saw that there was no roof membrane at all - - only plywood sheathing. The asphalt shingles on the rest of the sloped roof had been installed, but they never got around to finishing the equipment well.
This had previously passed city inspection, homebuilder's internal QC, and homeowner's inspection.
 
But wait, there's more: as the new guy at the company, we was paired up with a more senior guy - - literally senior, in his mid 70s and also not in good enough condition to climb the ladder up to the roof.
When my friend came back down the ladder, his co-worker was sitting in the living room drinking lemonade served to him by the lady of the house. My friend arrives just in time to hear him say: "Ma'm, you're so pretty, if I was 40 years younger I'd do ya right here on this couch!"
To which she just laughed and replied, "well, aren't you the lady-killer!"

That's what passed for customer service in the late 1980s.
 
Back
Top