Hi all, been thinking on this and could use some outside perspectives.
Concept: R-2 multi-story building. Pretty typical podium construction, apartments on upper floors, commercial on first, elevator provided. Project in OK. All upper floor dwellings would be Type A or B compliant, as typical.
From the perspective of the IBC (let's say 2018) and the FHA: Is there any instance in which you would be allowed to have some additional dwelling units on the ground floor with direct exterior access (aka not served by elevator) without accessible entries?
There's a project with the potential for 10 additional living units on the first floor with secured courtyards, but 3 of those would be kind of 'stuck' and accessible only by some steps due to site constraints. (The other 7 would be on the provided along the accessible route.)
As written, it seems like this is an 'elevator building' and therefore cannot take any site impracticality reduction. However, I don't believe the spirit of the code is to remove these other entry typologies entirely - and these dwellings wouldn't be served by an elevator anyway. What am I overlooking?
We aren't trying to skirt any elevator requirements, all common entries (and 70% of the individual ground floor dwelling entries) would be entirely accessible.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Concept: R-2 multi-story building. Pretty typical podium construction, apartments on upper floors, commercial on first, elevator provided. Project in OK. All upper floor dwellings would be Type A or B compliant, as typical.
From the perspective of the IBC (let's say 2018) and the FHA: Is there any instance in which you would be allowed to have some additional dwelling units on the ground floor with direct exterior access (aka not served by elevator) without accessible entries?
There's a project with the potential for 10 additional living units on the first floor with secured courtyards, but 3 of those would be kind of 'stuck' and accessible only by some steps due to site constraints. (The other 7 would be on the provided along the accessible route.)
As written, it seems like this is an 'elevator building' and therefore cannot take any site impracticality reduction. However, I don't believe the spirit of the code is to remove these other entry typologies entirely - and these dwellings wouldn't be served by an elevator anyway. What am I overlooking?
We aren't trying to skirt any elevator requirements, all common entries (and 70% of the individual ground floor dwelling entries) would be entirely accessible.
Thanks in advance for any help!