Code Neophyte
REGISTERED
From my understanding of the legalities of the act of issuing a permit, it is viewed in law as a ministerial act, and not subject to the discretion of the Building Official. In other words, if an applicant makes application, provides all of the required submittals (which are correct and of sufficient clarity), pays the fee, is properly licensed, etc., etc., etc., then the Building Official cannot refuse to issue a permit.
Now to the reason for the post: If a contractor fails to obtain permits for work on a project - let's call it "Project A" - and is served notice that the permit must be obtained ex post facto, fee paid, penalty imposed, etc., but he refuses to do so, can the Building Official refuse to issue a permit for "Project B", if all of the requirements for the issuance of that permit are met? Put aside licensing issues (and shouldn't that be the way to approach this? By suspending / revoking license?), can the Building Official refuse to issue a permit for a project unrelated?
Now to the reason for the post: If a contractor fails to obtain permits for work on a project - let's call it "Project A" - and is served notice that the permit must be obtained ex post facto, fee paid, penalty imposed, etc., but he refuses to do so, can the Building Official refuse to issue a permit for "Project B", if all of the requirements for the issuance of that permit are met? Put aside licensing issues (and shouldn't that be the way to approach this? By suspending / revoking license?), can the Building Official refuse to issue a permit for a project unrelated?