Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I don't think it is a wildfire thing....And it is going to get messy with this being stricter than the IEBC....Not a fan...Like a residential sprinkler system would make any difference at allif a wildfire burns a house from the outside in. All tht's going to do is open a lot of sprinkler heads, reducing water available to firefighters.
I don't think it is a wildfire thing....And it is going to get messy with this being stricter than the IEBC....Not a fan...
I'm sure Jeff submitted it months ago.....We will be voting on some part or version of it at the Orlando code change hearings...It is but it isn't. Or it isn't but it is.
This comes up right after half of California burned to the ground. Basically, it's a way to force sprinklers into more buildings.
Where half = on the order of 1 in 1000.half of California burned to the ground.
Where half = on the order of 1 in 1000.
Cheers, Wayne
LA is not all there is to Cali?...Hunh....So it's just the best part?Where half = on the order of 1 in 1000.
Cheers, Wayne
Exactly....Good luck with getting an insurance company to settle in 60 days let alone be able to obtain all the required permits that maybe required to do the work to make it occupiable space again.
Smoke damage alone could take more than 60 days to clean