Yikes
SAWHORSE
I have a project that is an existing car dealership being converted to a lmber / building supply store. The old dealership used to park their inventory on the store's roof (it was designed for this). The new owner wants to put public parking up there instead. The parking will be "open to the sky" ( we're removing the carport roofs that used to keep unsold inventory in the shade).
Don't worry, we'll have an accessible elevator, etc. - - but meanwhile, to clarify the code analysis, here's my understanding:
1. The rooftop parking itself has zero BUILDING area per 502, because it is open to the sky. The only building area is the enclosed space below. The parking will not count towards my maximum allowable building area.
2. The rooftop parking has NET FLOOR area per chapter 10 (that will count towards occupant load), because it is bounded by 42" parapet / guardrail walls.
3. The need for exit width and number of exits is now determined by table 1004.1.1 for "parking garages", not the former "stock / mercantile" load of the car storage.
The roof deck has a 13.56% concrete ramp leading up to it. so, we're just shy of the 12.5% slope to continue to use it as non-accessible MOE. However, we can add a series of 6" rise / 44.25" run steps on the ramp that will not require handrail per 1009.12 exc. 3.
Is this correct?
Don't worry, we'll have an accessible elevator, etc. - - but meanwhile, to clarify the code analysis, here's my understanding:
1. The rooftop parking itself has zero BUILDING area per 502, because it is open to the sky. The only building area is the enclosed space below. The parking will not count towards my maximum allowable building area.
2. The rooftop parking has NET FLOOR area per chapter 10 (that will count towards occupant load), because it is bounded by 42" parapet / guardrail walls.
3. The need for exit width and number of exits is now determined by table 1004.1.1 for "parking garages", not the former "stock / mercantile" load of the car storage.
The roof deck has a 13.56% concrete ramp leading up to it. so, we're just shy of the 12.5% slope to continue to use it as non-accessible MOE. However, we can add a series of 6" rise / 44.25" run steps on the ramp that will not require handrail per 1009.12 exc. 3.
Is this correct?