San Diego DOJ lawsuit??

[Mig]

New member here, and I have a question hopefully someone may be able to shed some light on.

I'm looking for a DOJ lawsuit against San Diego. I'm not sure exactly what the lawsuit is about, but I'm led to believe it has to do with secondary entrances at units and whether or not they have to be accessible. This was raised when I was having a discussion about San Francisco requiring 50% of ground floor units to have stoops, and then being told they are also required to be accessible. Despite the fact that the units primary entrance is already accessible as it is off an accessible corridor inside the building.

So if anyone is familiar with a lawsuit against San Diego on the issue of usable doors or secondary doors, that would be of great help. Or if anyone has a suggestion where to search that would also be helpful

 

[cda]

Welcome

 

[mark handler]

Contact the DOJ
ADA Information Line at 1-800-514-0301

 

[cda]

Don't think this is it

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/topi...-isnt-ada-compliant-and-its-costing-millions/

 

[mark handler]

Don't think this is it

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/topi...-isnt-ada-compliant-and-its-costing-millions/

NOTHING TO DO WITH EXITING

 

[cda]

NOTHING TO DO WITH EXITING

Like to beat up on the Chargers

One of these days they will win

One of these days they will get a new ADA compliant stadium.

 

[mark handler]

One of these days they will win
One of these days they will get a new ADA compliant stadium.

Don't bet on it

 

[conarb]

Like to beat up on the Chargers

One of these days they will win

One of these days they will get a new ADA compliant stadium.

And one of these days the taxpayers will turn on these rotten, blackmailing activists.

 

[Mig]

Just like to say thanks for the responses, I had no luck with finding this DOJ lawsuit but at this point I think it became irrelevant for my purposes.

 

[ADAguy]

Mig,
In NY you may be able to have only half of your exits accessible but not in CA, see CBC Chapter 10.