I’m consulting on an a remodel to an existing tenant space in an existing building. The layout was prepared by a space planner working for the tenant and I’ll be working with the contractor to submit the plans for permit.
Project specifics:
2018 IBC, Type III-B building, multi-tenant, fully sprinklered
Area of tenant space = 3,800 s.f.
B Occupancy. Occupant load = 3,800 / 150 = 26
The occupant load does not require a second exit but the common path of egress travel will exceed the 100’ allowed for a sprinklered building, B occupancy. Here, the CPET would be 156’.
Everything in me says providing the second exit through the conference room is not allowed. The conference room should be considered an accessory use to the tenant space and would not have a lock (1016.2.2 and 1016.2.3), but I personally have never designed a required exit that passes through a conference room before.
Bottom line: Is exiting through the conference room in this scenario allowed?
Project specifics:
2018 IBC, Type III-B building, multi-tenant, fully sprinklered
Area of tenant space = 3,800 s.f.
B Occupancy. Occupant load = 3,800 / 150 = 26
The occupant load does not require a second exit but the common path of egress travel will exceed the 100’ allowed for a sprinklered building, B occupancy. Here, the CPET would be 156’.
Everything in me says providing the second exit through the conference room is not allowed. The conference room should be considered an accessory use to the tenant space and would not have a lock (1016.2.2 and 1016.2.3), but I personally have never designed a required exit that passes through a conference room before.
Bottom line: Is exiting through the conference room in this scenario allowed?