• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Serial litigants sue Harrah’s over ADA issues

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,895
Location
So. CA
Serial litigants sue Harrah’s over ADA issues
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2017/jan/31/serial-litigants-sue-harrahs/

A disabled person with a history of suing businesses in Las Vegas has filed an Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuit against Harrah’s Las Vegas.
Robert P. Spretnak, a Las Vegas attorney listed on the court documents, filed the federal suit Sunday on behalf of Michele Joseph in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.

The lawsuit alleges that Harrah’s has multiple violations of the ADA involving parking, accessible routes to the business from parking, access to goods and services, public restrooms, guest rooms, and policies and procedures.

Representatives from Caesars Entertainment, which owns and operates Harrah’s, declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it is company policy not to discuss pending litigation.

Spretnak, who said he is not the lead attorney on the suit, added that he is “happy to play his part to help” address these issues to aid handicapped people. Owen B. Dunn Jr., of Toledo, Ohio, also listed in court documents, is the lead attorney, Spretnak said. A phone call to Dunn was not returned before this report was posted.

The lawsuit describes Joseph as a "tester," someone who enters businesses with the specific intent of “discovering, encountering and engaging discrimination against the disabled in public accommodations.”

Joseph, Mark Allison and an organization to which they belonged called the American Patriots Advocating for Disabled Rights have been involved in a number of similar lawsuits in the Las Vegas area through the years.

In a search of a federal court database from Jan. 1, 2001, through Monday, the American Patriots Advocating for Disabled Rights is listed as a plaintiff in eight cases. Both Joseph and Allison are listed in several others for that same time period.

In May 2010, the group sued Budget Suites of America. In 2008, the group made similar allegations against Palace Station. Also in 2008, it sued the Super 8 Motel in North Las Vegas.

Federal court records also show that American Patriots reached out-of-court settlements of similar complaints it lodged against the Las Vegas Hilton, Blockbuster Video (9240 W. Sahara Ave.) and three rental suite facilities in Las Vegas owned by L.A. Wilshire Corp.

In documents as part of the Budget Suites lawsuit, attorneys for Budget Suites described the group as “professional litigants that have created a cottage industry by exploiting Congress’ well-intentioned statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act, into an income-producing mechanism.”

Spretnak said it is not unusual for disabled people to run into access problems in multiple places and said “there is very little money to be made in these lawsuits."

Neither Allison nor American Patriots Advocating for Disabled Rights is a party to this most recent suit against Harrah’s.
 
That's why Blockbuster went out of business!....Those villians!
Blockbuster, as well as 99% of other video Stores, went out of business due to streaming online/internet. NOT ADA.
More Alternate Facts? That's why this country is in such disarray. Lack of logic, business closes, must be ADA's fault. IF A, then B.
 
Last edited:
Alternate Fact:

They do not appear to be serial litigants but then the search would not necessarily reveal out of court settlements.

Thank you for your continuing to alert us to these cases.
 
ADAguy, the other day I was in a Costco and saw that all of their motorized riding, shopping carts had new large placards on them stating "Maximum Weight 500 lbs", isn't that discriminating against the fatsos over 500 lbs?
 
Just a disclaimer, knowing that "larges" shop at Walmart they should also provide higher capacity carts too, or none at all.

Its sort of like saying disabled vs Handicapped, which is more offensive? 500 max or 500 (+)?
 
Most stores have pallet jacks and small forklifts...but what about the toilet stalls and the weight capacity of the commodes? Are we endangering these weight challenged folks by allowing them to sit on a WC that is underrated for their weight?
 
Ah, "the thrones", porcelain if floor mounted is quite strong in :compression, less so when wall hung (their support brackets are rated to 1,000 lbs in dead load but the porcelain can fail under dynamic load (think a couple of 300 lb high school lineman fooling around after practice. Better to use prison grade stainless steel. Obesity is/should be an "increasing" consideration in public design.

This has yet to be "tested" in the courts, remember "code" minimum vs best practice.
 
Back
Top