• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Several Rochester businesses hit with Disabilities Act suits

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,895
Location
So. CA
http://www.postbulletin.com/business/several-rochester-businesses-hit-with-disabilities-act-suits/article_47528c47-5133-535d-b13b-169652dd17d1.html

July 2, 2015 .

Jeff Kiger, jkiger@postbulletin.com

A Minneapolis attorney is leading a "crusade" to make Rochester businesses more handicapped accessible, while negotiating hefty payments to keep the cases out of court.

Paul Hansmeier has threatened to file suits against at least eight Rochester businesses in the last four to six weeks, according to attorney Greg Griffiths of Dunlap & Seeger. He described the majority of the complaints as focusing on the parking lot markings, signage and the business entryways.

Hansmeier did not respond to calls to his Class Justice LLC office in Minneapolis for comment.

Griffiths, who has a stack of these cases on his desk, said the local business owners he's spoken to all are eager to be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, fixing the issues does not satisfy Hansmeier or his clients, the nonprofit Disability Support Alliance, said Griffiths.

One of the Rochester businesses affected was Bilotti's Pizzeria. Owner Karla Sperry first was notified of a problem when an information letter threatening a civil lawsuit arrived two weeks ago. The suit pointed out her handicapped parking spaces at 821 Civic Center Drive did not have signs in addition to the lot markings. The complaint asked for $5,000 for damages.

Sperry said the signs had been in place previously, but had disappeared in recent months during renovations to the building. She is fixing the issue by placing the handicapped parking spots by the front door and affixing the signs to the building.

"I don't mind putting up signs. Many of my customers are disabled," she said.

However, she adds that none of her regular customers had complained about the lack of parking signs.

"These people (Disability Support Alliance) had no intention of supporting my business when they drove in here," Sperry said angrily. "They came in here with every intention of getting rich quick."

Through Dunlap & Seeger, she's currently negotiating with Hansmeier over the damages.

Mary Alexander, a co-owner of Rochester's Hillcrest Shopping Center, also has been threatened with an ADA lawsuit, and she called it "kind of a cheap shot."

Hillcrest is another target of the ADA suits. While the small shopping center had the required number of handicapped parking spaces and signs, it did not have the additional marked off area for loading and unloading wheelchairs required in the later version of the ADA.

"We fixed that right away. Everything is in compliance now," she said. "We're very respectful of the handicapped."

Like Bilotti's, Hillcrest is negotiating with Hansmeier for damages.

Hansmeier has filed a large number of these type of lawsuits throughout the state, including in Marshall and Mankato, according to news reports. Before pursuing ADA cases, he was well known for suits against Internet users charging they had illegally downloaded copyrighted pornography.

He has been quoted in the media saying, "We consider ourselves to be an advocacy association more than we consider ourselves a law firm. With the porn reputation, I wanted to shift my focus and focus on something more positive."

Zach Hillesheim, the wheelchair-bound general manager at Disability Support Alliance, has told other media that Hansmeier's tactics are necessary because of the way the law was written.

"The ADA pretty much begs that somebody does this," he was quoted in the Mankato Free Press as saying.

The 25-year-old ADA law is not as simple to follow as many think, according to Griffiths. Businesses in compliance with the original rules might be OK, even though they don't follow changes that were added in 2009. However, if the buildings or parking lot have been updated, businesses might need to follow the updated 2009 rules.

Dunlap & Seeger's Griffiths and Sarah Gibson wrote a statement about ADA and compliance that the Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce sent out to its members last week.

"The ADA design standards are triggered when a business carries out an alteration of its facilities," they wrote in the statement. "Specific examples of an alteration include restriping a parking lot, moving walls, moving a fixed ATM to another location, installing a new sales counter or display shelves, changing a doorway entrance, replacing fixtures, flooring or carpeting. Normal maintenance, such as reroofing, painting or wallpapering, is not an alteration."

To avoid a lawsuit, Griffiths and Gibson recommend businesses review their buildings and parking lots.

Unlike the eight small cases, Hansmeier and Disability Support Alliance filed a much larger case against the Kahler Grand Hotel in March in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis saying that Hillesheim and a companion who also uses a wheelchair found a long list of violations during a stay at the hotel.

The Kahler Hotels have responded with a counter-claim asking for $50,000 in damages from the Disability Support Alliance. The countersuit says the original complaint "misuses and perverts the purpose of a civil action."

No one from the Kahler Hotels responded to requests for comment on the case. which still is pending
 
Clients defend disability lawsuits in Rochester

http://www.postbulletin.com/business/clients-defend-disability-lawsuits-in-rochester/article_ead00e6b-faa7-5156-964f-589ff81c67b7.html

Mon Jul 6, 2015.

Jeff Kiger, jkiger@postbulletin.com

The clients behind recent costly disability lawsuits against Rochester businesses say the money they collect will create programs to help disabled people.

"We all suffer with access issues," said Melanie Davis, a student from Jackson, Minn. "The ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) has been effect for many years. We've gotten tired of not having the same level of access everybody else has,"

Davis, who has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair, is one of four board members of the Minnesota-based Disability Support Alliance. She, along with other alliance members, filed at least eight lawsuits in the last two months against Rochester businesses over ADA violations. The non-profit Disability Support Alliance was formed on July 3, 2014.

Davis and her companions recently stayed in Rochester for about week. When asked why they were here, she replied, "We travel. There were various reasons for being in Rochester, like medical things. We like touring and stuff like that."

Surprised by lawsuits

Many of the local businesses, such as Bilotti's Pizzeria and Hillcrest Shopping Center, were surprised by the lawsuits. Neither Davis nor any of her companions made complaints directly to the businesses during their visit to Rochester.

The DSA's Minneapolis attorney, Paul Hansmeier, approaches businesses about settling the lawsuits for amounts, like $5,000. That has led some of the businesses to wonder if the suits are more about making money than resolving accessibility issues.

"These people (from the DSA) had no intention of supporting my business when they drove in here. They came in here with every intention of getting rich quick," said Bilotti's owner Karla Sperry, who is addressing the problem with signage for her handicapped parking spots.

Davis disputes that claim. She said none of the board members receive salaries or part of the settlements. However, they did receive travel expenses to attend their board meetings, which occur every three months. She said DSA board members are mostly supported by payments from Social Security.

"We're getting paid for damages, and we donate the money back into the DSA. That's basically how it works," she explained.

The money from the settlements goes into a fund to be used by the DSA to develop programs to help disabled people in Minnesota, Davis said.

"All of those (programs) are in the works. Nothing is working yet at the moment," she said when asked about the support programs.

Hansmeier, who works for law firm Class Justice, handles all of DSA's lawsuits and does collect a portion of the settlements, she said.

"It's not a salary, but he gets a portion from each case," Davis said. "Paul receives his own salary from his law firm, which is a contract which we developed between our organizations."

When asked what percentage of each settlement that Hansmeier collects, she declined to answer.

Litigious past

Hansmeier has filed a large number of this type of lawsuit throughout the state, including in Marshall and Mankato. Before pursuing ADA cases, he was well known for suits against Internet users, charging they had illegally downloaded copyrighted pornography. A federal judge ordered Hansmeier and others to pay sanctions related to that practice. Prenda Law, the firm Hansmeier worked with on the porn cases, has been dissolved.

He has been quoted in the media saying, "We consider ourselves to be an advocacy association more than we consider ourselves a law firm. With the porn reputation, I wanted to shift my focus and focus on something more positive."

In 2013, Hansmeier began filing a number of ADA-related cases for a disabled Minneapolis client named Eric A Wong. In a deposition for one of the cases, Wong testified that Hansmeier's brother, Peter Hansmeier, and others working with Hansmeier would take him to businesses to see if he could access them.

Hennepin County District Court Chief Judge Peter Cahill flagged six of the cases at the end of 2013 and ordered them all assigned to one judge to make sure they were all managed the same way.

The judge wrote that the manner in which the lawsuits were filed "… raises the specter of litigation abuse, and Mr. Hansmeier's history reinforces this concern."

Davis said Wong is chairman of the DSA board. He recruited her to the board after she appeared in a documentary called "Independence to Inclusion" by Twin Cities Public Television in April 2014.

"He (Eric) had a vision for a better life," she said.

As far as Hansmeier's controversial past as an attorney, Davis said that doesn't concern her or any of the other board members.

"For us right now, it comes down to this, everybody has a past. What he did then is very different than what he's doing now," she said. "We're thankful for someone who's willing to help us exercise our civil rights."

In an email to the Post-Bulletin, Hansmeier reiterated the reason for the lawsuits is to make businesses more accessible, not to make money.

"Regardless of whether everyone agrees with my clients' efforts there can be no question that more attention to these issues will encourage more business owners to obey the law without the need for a lawsuit," he wrote.

Hansmeier also clarified in his email that a lawsuit he filed for DSA against Rochester's Kahler Grand Hotel in March plus a counter-suit filed in response by Kahler were settled in April.
 
No where in the article does it address that the businesses are in fact non-compliant. "Whats their Beef?"

Are they sueing in state or federal court?
 
Back
Top