• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Smoke alarms pass inspection, but troubles persist for Pasco retirement home

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,892
Location
So. CA
Smoke alarms pass inspection, but troubles persist for Pasco retirement home

By Mark Douglas

October 6, 2015

http://wfla.com/2015/10/06/failed-smoke-alarms-pass-inspection-but-other-troubles-persist-for-pasco-county-retirement-home/

DADE CITY, Fla. (WFLA) – A team of inspectors comprised of the Dade City fire marshal, Dade City building official and an investigator with the Agency for Health Care Administration spent nearly four hours Tuesday checking every smoke alarm inside apartments at the 205-bed Edwinola Retirement Community.

That inspection comes two weeks after 8 On Your Side first revealed that City Fire Marshal Doug True failed to find even one working smoke detector in the facility, which is home to elderly and disabled residents, earlier this year. True told 8 On Your Side Tuesday that he took the word of a staff member at the Edwinola that the smoke detectors would be repaired or replaced and never returned to confirm that action.

Our Sept. 22nd 8 On Your Side report triggered a state investigation by AHCA, and according to some residents, a flurry of activity as Edwinola maintenance workers rushed to replace smoke detectors in a number of rooms at the troubled facility. After Tuesday’s re-inspection prompted by our report, Dade City building official Mike Barthle told 8 On Your Side every smoke detector inside the Edwinola passed inspection. Eight months had passed since the fire marshal reported a 100 percent failure rate during his first two inspections.

One of the Edwinola’s residents invited News Channel 8 inside Tuesday to check the smoke detector in her seventh floor room. The device appeared to be new and in working order. That resident and a friend, who said his father lived in another apartment on the fourth floor, both said maintenance workers replaced the smoke detection devices after 8 On Your Side reported that 100 percent – 10 out of 10 – of the smoke detectors tested by the Dade City fire marshal in January and February failed to operate.

Edwinola is one of more than 3,000 licensed assisted living facilities in Florida. It is the only one currently under a moratorium, which bans the facility from accepting new patients. That moratorium follows the beating death of an Alzheimer’s patient by another unsupervised Alzheimer’s patient in April and the suicide of a third unsupervised Alzheimer’s patient that same month. Several patients with Alzheimer’s also wandered away from the Edwinola’s “lockdown” units and ended up on nearby highways due to inadequate supervision.

In recent months the facility has also been bedeviled by a bed bug infestation and conclusions by state inspectors that Edwinola’s staff members mishandled medications and possibly deprived residents of prescribed medications for weeks at a time. AHCA initiated action to revoke the facility’s license but last month suddenly put that process on hold to facilitate “settlement talks.”

Tuesday afternoon the AHCA investigator and Dade City inspectors slipped out of a side door headed to their cars and quickly drove away without comment while 8 On Your Side waited near the front entrance for news of their findings.

AHCA spokeswoman Shelisha Coleman said she cannot comment on the outcome of Tuesday’s smoke alarm inspection or how that will impact the state’s pending complaint. The matter will become public, Coleman said, when it is published on the agency’s website.
 
cda said:
sounds like it should be shut down
And where do you move the 205 residents? Some times the waiting list to get into one of those facilities can be months.

New local management would be a good start and some heads rolling in upper management if they have not been approving cost for keeping the life safety systems working correctly.

My experience is to often the local manager is caught between wanting to do what is required and budget constraints that upper management refuse to override. When this is the problem I find that copying the firms attorney's with the correction notices usually produces results.
 
mtlogcabin said:
My experience is to often the local manager is caught between wanting to do what is required and budget constraints that upper management refuse to override.
So true, this can be a major problem dealing with apartment complex's, especially with out of town owners.
 
As baby-boomers continue to age, an increasing number find themselves in these types of facilities. The Greatest Generation is already heavily populating them as well.

The need for more facilities increases daily, and the folks who develop these facilities are often 'developers' who care more about the bottom line than patient well being.

(biting tongue to avoid political rant...)

This means that it will be increasingly incumbent upon Code Officials and other regulators to do a better job of inspecting, and not only citing violations, but following up on corrections as well.
 
Back
Top