• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

South Florida leads nation in controversial disability lawsuits

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
12,937
Location
Not where I really want to be
South Florida leads nation in controversial disability lawsuits

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/bro...,4586435.story

By Amy Shipley and John Maines, Sun Sentinel

11:06 p.m. EST, January 11, 2014

South Florida has become the runaway national leader in federal disabled-access lawsuits that some say are accomplishing little more than providing quick cash to attorneys.

More than one of every five such claims filed in the United States in 2013 originated in the Southern District of Florida, where cases often end in hasty settlements that ensure attorneys get paid and make the lawsuits disappear — but fail to correct the violations they are supposed to address.

Local business owners say they are being extorted by a handful of serial-filing lawyers more concerned with turning profits than helping the disabled

"They don't care if you fix it or not," said Darcy L. Tyson, a Delray Beach code enforcement officer. The businesses "pay between $5,000 and $12,000 and it goes away ... People are taking complete advantage. It's a moneymaker. It has nothing to do with compliance."

The suits, which allege violations ranging from wheelchair ramps that are too steep to paper-towel dispensers perched too high, now hit South Florida's federal courts more than twice a day and have swelled by 500 percent in the last five years. The rise in local cases has significantly outpaced the national average, which has seen cases nearly double during that time.

Just five attorneys and a handful of plaintiffs brought almost two-thirds of the nearly 700 disabled-access suits in Florida's southern district in 2013. They say they are performing a public service by pressuring reluctant business owners to meet accommodation standards laid out in the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act.

"The only people who enforce the ADA are these few plaintiffs and their attorneys," said Thomas B. Bacon, a Cooper City attorney who has represented plaintiffs in more than 300 disabled-access cases.

Though the U.S. government also files occasional lawsuits, the Act was designed to empower private citizens to bring claims so the Department of Justice would not have the burden of chasing down every mom-and-pop operation in violation.

Only the attorneys, not the plaintiffs, stand to profit from the suits. The Act does not provide for damages, but it was designed to give citizens incentive to bring the lawsuits by allowing them to recover what they pay for attorneys and court fees. The financial risk of paying the bills for two sets of attorneys motivates many businesses to settle rather than go to court.

But the law provides no such incentive for plaintiffs and their attorneys to ensure that promised improvements are made once the checks clear.

"About 80 percent of the [businesses] don't ever do the changes or do a minimal amount of changes, and that defeats the whole purpose of the ADA," said Bob Cohen, the head of Access for the Disabled, a not-for-profit in Coral Springs that has been a party in more than 375 such lawsuits.

Neighborhoods from Palm Beach to Miami-Dade counties have been hit by the recent waves of lawsuits. Eight eateries along a lively third-of-a-mile stretch of Delray Beach's Atlantic Avenue — including Buddha Sky Bar, City Oyster & Sushi Bar, Carpe Diem, Scuola Vecchia Pizza e Vino and the now-closed Paddy McGee's — were named in suits from a single plaintiff during a one-month filing blitz just over a year ago.

One Palm Beach restaurant owner confided to the Sun Sentinel that he agreed in a settlement to pay more than $12,000 in plaintiff's attorney's fees, but didn't have enough cash after forking over those costs to fix all of the violations in his establishment. The owner declined to be named. So far, he said, nobody's come back to check.

"What I've seen out there is almost zero enforcement of previous settlement agreements," said Douglas Steven Schapiro, a Boca Raton attorney who has both sued and defended businesses in ADA cases. "Which is really sad."

Dangerous door mats

Before he was served with a lawsuit in October, Sergio do Rosario said he had not received a single complaint about access to his strip mall in Pompano Beach.

The suit alleged at least nine violations. Among them: Do Rosario's disabled parking space was not large enough to accommodate a disabled-access van, and door mats at store entrances represented dangerous obstacles.

Do Rosario said he and his business partner could have improved the property if given notice before a lawsuit was filed. Now, he said, they have additional costs to bear.

"I not only have to pay for a [new] ramp, I have to pay some lawyer $500 per hour," do Rosario said.

Joe Houston, who requires a wheelchair to get around and has limited use of his hands, disputed the assertion that businesses would willingly comply with federal law if only they knew they were in violation.
 
I have a buddy that owns a new yogurt store about a year old which was completely renovated and has a C of O. Both bathrooms have round doorknobs. I told him he might want to think about putting lever handles on and he said that he heard that is a new requirement in Florida but was not last year when he renovated to move into the new location. Wow! Great education and enforcement, huh?
 
ADA as a business has many participants. Designers, builders, manufacturers, legislators, inspectors, all work in the ADA industry.

Then along came the lawyers. They jumped in at $500 hr. A high-school kid could master enough legal acumen to file these lawsuits and they are more of a bill than a lawsuit.

The common retort is "Well the business owners had years to comply and they ignored our plea for access". That's mean spirited. The access rarely improves, a pile of money leaves the area and now the business owner will continue to ignore ADA. The only winner is the lawyer. She could do it all from a Hawaiian beach.

So they drug their feet. Does that condone the pillaging that's going on? It's now okay for a lawyer to pry thousands of dollars out of a business and give them nothing in return? The violation goes unabated and the plaintiff trips on down the boulevard plucking ripe fruit.

It is dumbfounding that it continues. We think that government is there to serve us, protect us...what folly. This is a national disgrace.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top