• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Stupid Wood Question

cda

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
20,962
Location
Basement
So occasionally run into wood in concealed spaces, in a building with a fire sprinkler system,, that would normally require fire sprinkler protection....

I do not like the clear liquid spray on,,, that is supposed to fire retard...,

So wondering if anyone has seen

spray-applied fire-resistive material

Sprayed on wood?????

 
I've seen an intumescent coating on steel that provided a 2-hour fire rating. It was applied in several coats to a 1/8" to 1/4" thickness.

All I've seen for wood is to reduce flame spread, not provide a fire resistance rating.
 
I've seen an intumescent coating on steel that provided a 2-hour fire rating. It was applied in several coats to a 1/8" to 1/4" thickness.

All I've seen for wood is to reduce flame spread, not provide a fire resistance rating.

Looks like they have a 1-hour rating when applied to wood.
 

Looks like they have a 1-hour rating when applied to wood.

the intumescent wood coatings have been around a little while now. I'm actually using it on a current project to protect a bunch of heavy timber canopy structures so I don't have to install sprinklers under them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So occasionally run into wood in concealed spaces, in a building with a fire sprinkler system,, that would normally require fire sprinkler protection....

I do not like the clear liquid spray on,,, that is supposed to fire retard...,
CDA
Are you a designer or a BO?
 
Is there a code basis for the product? What is the standard that is referenced by the regulations?
 
Darn building officials...

CDA....Can it be covered in drywall?


WELL, kind of asking for future reference,,,,

On the current project, there is a lot to cover, and access has been compromised.

So GC asked about spraying, and told him no on the clear liquid stuff.

But drove by a church going up, and they were coating the steel, and thought, Can they do that to wood????
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is there a code basis for the product? What is the standard that is referenced by the regulations?
For my wood canopies structures I have to provide material that meet the definition of non combustible or limited combustible material, the reference testing standard was ASTM E84.
 
what was the justification for not allowing the clear liquid stuff? Is it not allowed under the code?

The product I'm using is FlameSafe Fire Poly FP100.


Because I said so???

Not factory applied to the material

Wears out over the years.


In extreme weather conditions it may be necessary to re-coat surfaces every three to five years





Plus I like to field test to see if it works
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wood-framed apartment buildings are complying with NFPA 13 by blowing the concealed space full of non combustible insulation.
 
Because I said so???

Not factory applied to the material

Wears out over the years.


In extreme weather conditions it may be necessary to re-coat surfaces every three to five years





Plus I like to filed test!!!!!!! To see if it works
what kind of extreme weather event are you expecting in a concealed space inside a building?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cda
what kind of extreme weather event are you expecting in a concealed space inside a building?


Good point,,

Plus the wood is up already, so might not be able to treat all surfaces, or treat some of the exposed surfaces properly.
 
Wood-framed apartment buildings are complying with NFPA 13 by blowing the concealed space full of non combustible insulation.
As long as the listed assembly allows the added insulation....

17. Blanket Insulation

Unless specifically described in the individual designs, the addition of insulation in the concealed space between the ceiling membrane and the floor or roof structure may reduce the hourly rating of an assembly by causing premature disruption of the ceiling membrane and/or higher temperatures on structural components under fire-exposure conditions.

Insulation in G500, L500, M500 and P500 Series Designs — For 1-hour-rated G500, L500, M500 and P500 Series assemblies, fiberglass insulation, either loose-fill, or faced or unfaced batts or blankets may be added to the plenum or joist space above the gypsum board, provided an additional layer of gypsum board is added to the assembly. The gypsum board should be of the same type as shown in the individual designs. The base layer of gypsum board should be attached with the fastener type and spacing as described in the design. It is not necessary to tape the joints of the base layer. The finish layer of gypsum board should also be attached with the fastener type and spacing as described in the individual design. The length of the fasteners should be increased by a minimum of the gypsum board thickness of the additional layer. The joints in the finish layer should be finished as described in the design.

Other methods of adding insulation in the plenum or joist cavity are not permitted unless indicated in the individual designs.
 
As long as the listed assembly allows the added insulation....

17. Blanket Insulation

Unless specifically described in the individual designs, the addition of insulation in the concealed space between the ceiling membrane and the floor or roof structure may reduce the hourly rating of an assembly by causing premature disruption of the ceiling membrane and/or higher temperatures on structural components under fire-exposure conditions.

Insulation in G500, L500, M500 and P500 Series Designs — For 1-hour-rated G500, L500, M500 and P500 Series assemblies, fiberglass insulation, either loose-fill, or faced or unfaced batts or blankets may be added to the plenum or joist space above the gypsum board, provided an additional layer of gypsum board is added to the assembly. The gypsum board should be of the same type as shown in the individual designs. The base layer of gypsum board should be attached with the fastener type and spacing as described in the design. It is not necessary to tape the joints of the base layer. The finish layer of gypsum board should also be attached with the fastener type and spacing as described in the individual design. The length of the fasteners should be increased by a minimum of the gypsum board thickness of the additional layer. The joints in the finish layer should be finished as described in the design.

Other methods of adding insulation in the plenum or joist cavity are not permitted unless indicated in the individual designs.
Steveray, what are you referencing above? Can you provide a link?
 
Used Firefree 88 back in the day, surface applied to one side. Vender demonstrated it on the interior of a cardboard tunnel for local fire chiefs. No heat transfer to back side. Stuff can be scraped off and reapplied if a fire occurs. Used on old hotel and apartment corridors. Has a UL rating.
 
Back
Top