• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Sweet deck

raider1

Silver Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
479
Location
North Logan Utah
Here are a few pictures of a deck I just finished inspecting, enjoy.









The "cantilevered" joists are just toe nailed into the beam.

Chris
 
ccbuilding said:
You didn't walk up those steps when you did the inspection did you? I think that would classify for hazard pay.
Unfortunately I walked down the stairs from the deck before I saw what was underneath. :)

As soon as I walked down the stairs I could tell that there were some major issues as the deflection on the stairs was scary. :D

Chris
 
chris,

good thing it doesn't snow in utah! if you added snow loads to other dead and live loads ,this thing would be a disaster waiting to happen. did you final it? :mrgreen:
 
Utah gets mega-snow... tends to be real fluffy stuff from what I'm told.

To their credit (the deck builders) they did use three stringers instead of two... that should keep the stairs together when they collapse.
 
pwood said:
chris, good thing it doesn't snow in utah! if you added snow loads to other dead and live loads ,this thing would be a disaster waiting to happen. did you final it? :mrgreen:
Here in North Logan we have a ground snow load of 53 pounds per square foot. :)

I wrote up a 2 page report of violations and red tagged the deck.

The unfortunate thing is that the homeowners have already paid the contractor and thought that the contractor had gotten all of the necessary inspections on the deck.

The only reason I got a call out to the deck is my City sent out a letter to the homeowners stating that the permit for the deck/sunroom had not had any inspections called for and the permit had been pulled 90 days prior.

Chris
 
i have never been to utah before but i had a suspicion that it snowed there. i figured with all the salt there the snow would melt as soon as it hits the ground:mrgreen: we throw salt on our sidewalks to melt the stuff! our ground snow is 58 p.s.f. here and as high as 400 p.s.f. 30 miles from downtown! the deck looks like a tear down and do again. the owner will probably just use it and let the permit expire without addressing the corrections. then what do you do? expire the permit and put it in the parcel file?
 
pwood said:
i have never been to utah before but i had a suspicion that it snowed there. i figured with all the salt there the snow would melt as soon as it hits the ground:mrgreen: we throw salt on our sidewalks to melt the stuff! our ground snow is 58 p.s.f. here and as high as 400 p.s.f. 30 miles from downtown! the deck looks like a tear down and do again. the owner will probably just use it and let the permit expire without addressing the corrections. then what do you do? expire the permit and put it in the parcel file?
I live far enough away from the Great Salt Lake that we don't have much random salt on the ground. :D :D

This is definitely a tear down and redo deck. I don't see any way to fix the problems with the deck still up.

The owner is very upset with the contractor and wants this done right. Their only recourse is most likely taking the contractor to court.

Chris
 
That so called "cantilevered" part looks like they built the deck too small, and had to add 14 or so inches to the side of it, and they just toe nailed it on!
 
My first jurisdiction had a townhouse community with original balconies (circa 1970's) that started rotting by the mid-90's. Some 'contractors' were cutting off the old, leaving 12" - 18" stubs and adding new 6' joists to them with no additional supports... must've done a couple of dozen before they got caught. The balconies were on the backs of the units which offered privacy by design, so we had a hard time finding the problems. Weekend warriors without permits, "but we were just replacing what they had, so we didn't need permits, right?" "WRONG!!!"
 
HAR! I love the "only replacing what was there" excuse. My usual response is "So your building a new deck"

How ya dooin JBI?
 
Glennman CBO said:
That so called "cantilevered" part looks like they built the deck too small, and had to add 14 or so inches to the side of it, and they just toe nailed it on!
That is exactly what happened. According to the owner after the deck was built the contractor realized that the end was too narrow to build the stairs onto and had to widen the deck to accommodate the stair width. :)

Chris
 
So Raider, what was the "fix" provided in response to your correction notice? I'd be interested in comparing the before/after pictures, not to mention the excuses from the "contractor".
 
Back
Top