TimNY
REGISTERED
So... a single layer of foil-bubble-foil insulation is routinely approved elsewhere for duct insulation. It's stamped R-4.2, which doesn't meet the R-8 required outside the thermal envelope.. but I digress...
I failed an inspection for having this stuff as the only insulation on the ducts. Left note R-8 required.
Contractor installed another layer of bubble wrap. Ugh. I tell contractor you can't do that and that I want test results from a 3rd party substantiating the R-4.2 claim. He sends me specification sheets. Ugh.
Got a call from the manufacturer who basically sided with me, stated the insulation was installed wrong and instructions not followed.
Anyway, here are the details I used to cite the violation:
1. Energy conservation code defines thermal resistance (R-Value) as the reciprocal. of thermal conductance. Thermal conductance is measured from one bounding surface to another bounding surface. Air spaces are not included. These bubble wraps all include an air space to achieve their rating. I spoke with the rep about this and he rattled off some other ASTM test that was needed to get those values.
2. Manufacturer's instructions state "Not recommended as the only insulation" a condensation will form.
3. Here is the good one. Manufacturer states you cannot double the material to achieve twice the R-value. If further states when this is does that the value is reduced to R-1.1 per layer. So now we know it has an actual R-Value (in the real world) of R-1.1.
Hope this helps. We all knew it wasn't right, but I needed to cite something.
I failed an inspection for having this stuff as the only insulation on the ducts. Left note R-8 required.
Contractor installed another layer of bubble wrap. Ugh. I tell contractor you can't do that and that I want test results from a 3rd party substantiating the R-4.2 claim. He sends me specification sheets. Ugh.
Got a call from the manufacturer who basically sided with me, stated the insulation was installed wrong and instructions not followed.
Anyway, here are the details I used to cite the violation:
1. Energy conservation code defines thermal resistance (R-Value) as the reciprocal. of thermal conductance. Thermal conductance is measured from one bounding surface to another bounding surface. Air spaces are not included. These bubble wraps all include an air space to achieve their rating. I spoke with the rep about this and he rattled off some other ASTM test that was needed to get those values.
2. Manufacturer's instructions state "Not recommended as the only insulation" a condensation will form.
3. Here is the good one. Manufacturer states you cannot double the material to achieve twice the R-value. If further states when this is does that the value is reduced to R-1.1 per layer. So now we know it has an actual R-Value (in the real world) of R-1.1.
Hope this helps. We all knew it wasn't right, but I needed to cite something.