• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

The Influence of Local Politics in Municipal Building Departments

Political influence within municipal building departments can significantly impact their operations and create various challenges. This comprehensive analysis explores how political pressures manifest in building departments, particularly in small or rural communities, and the broader implications of such influences.

1. Influence from Elected Officials​

Elected officials sometimes exert pressure on building departments to favor friends and constituents. This can range from direct threats to subtle political intimidation, leading to expedited permits or overlooked violations, undermining regulatory compliance.

2. Pressure from Municipal Managers​

Municipal managers, often appointed by elected officials, may face similar political pressures. These pressures are then passed on to building department staff, resulting in decisions driven by political considerations rather than adherence to building codes and regulations.

3. Influence from Contractors and Homeowners​

Contractors and homeowners with political connections often leverage their influence to receive preferential treatment, such as faster permit approvals or lenient enforcement of building codes. This creates an uneven playing field for those without such connections.

4. Creating a Culture of Political Compliance​

Political influence can foster a culture where decisions are made based on the perceived threat of political repercussions rather than legal and regulatory requirements. This undermines the department's mission to enforce building codes consistently and ensure public safety.

5. Misuse of Building Department Revenue​

Some municipalities misuse revenue generated by the building department by transferring it to the general fund. This practice can leave the building department understaffed, compelling staff to push permits through quickly to keep up with demand. Such transfers, while legal, can have negative consequences. For example, transferring funds from an enterprise fund to balance the general fund can deplete resources meant for specific services, undermining the department's ability to function effectively (Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law) (American Accounting Association).

6. Economic and Political Factors​

Economic factors such as recessions, inflation, and unforeseen economic shocks can influence the stability of the general fund. Political influences, including shifts in administrative priorities, lobbying, and legislative constraints, also play a significant role in how general fund resources are allocated (SuperfastCPA CPA Review) (Government Finance Officers Association).

7. Impact on Building Department Operations​

The combined effect of political pressures and revenue mismanagement can lead to several operational challenges within building departments:
  • Staffing Issues: Chronic understaffing can result from the diversion of building department revenues to the general fund. With fewer resources, departments may struggle to hire and retain qualified personnel, leading to increased workloads and potential burnout among existing staff (SuperfastCPA CPA Review) (Government Finance Officers Association).
  • Inconsistent Code Enforcement: Political pressures can cause inconsistencies in code enforcement. When decisions are influenced by political connections rather than regulatory standards, it can create confusion and frustration among contractors and homeowners, undermining trust in the department (American Accounting Association).
  • Reduced Training and Development: Budget constraints resulting from fund transfers can limit opportunities for staff training and professional development. This can hinder the department’s ability to stay updated with the latest building codes, technologies, and best practices (Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law).

Case Studies and Examples​

  1. Fund Transfers and Budget Balancing: In North Carolina, local governments can transfer excess revenues from enterprise funds to the general fund to balance the budget. While this practice helps maintain financial stability, it can strain the resources of the enterprise fund, affecting its intended operations (Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law).
  2. Hawaii's Hurricane Relief Fund: In 2011, Hawaii depleted its Hurricane Relief Fund to balance the general fund, demonstrating how fund transfers can impact essential services and long-term preparedness (American Accounting Association).
  3. Transparency and Public Oversight: Transparency measures, such as public availability of financial reports and online dashboards, are crucial for maintaining accountability in fund management. Public meetings and hearings allow community members to provide input on budget proposals, enhancing oversight and preventing misuse of funds (SuperfastCPA CPA Review).

8. Addressing the Challenges​

To mitigate the negative effects of political influence and revenue mismanagement, building departments and municipalities can adopt several strategies:
  • Enhanced Transparency: Implementing transparency measures such as real-time financial dashboards and regular public updates can improve accountability and public trust. These tools allow citizens to monitor how funds are spent and provide feedback on budget decisions (SuperfastCPA CPA Review).
  • Independent Oversight: Establishing independent oversight bodies can help ensure that building department operations and financial practices are not unduly influenced by political pressures. These bodies can conduct audits and reviews to identify and address issues related to fund transfers and code enforcement (Government Finance Officers Association).
  • Staff Training and Development: Investing in staff training and professional development is essential for maintaining a knowledgeable and competent workforce. Allocating resources for continuous education can help building department staff stay updated with current codes and best practices (Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law).
  • Long-Term Financial Planning: Developing comprehensive long-term financial plans can help municipalities anticipate and address future challenges. These plans should include strategies for maintaining adequate fund balances, managing economic fluctuations, and ensuring consistent funding for essential services (Government Finance Officers Association).

To Summarize​

Political influence in municipal building departments can lead to uneven enforcement of building codes, misuse of departmental revenues, and a culture of compliance driven by political rather than regulatory considerations. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for building officials, contractors, and the community to ensure fair and consistent enforcement of building codes.

  1. Academia Analysis:
    • Political Factors Affecting Construction Industry: This source discusses the various political factors that influence the construction industry, including government policies, political stability, and government funding. It provides insight into how political environments can impact the performance and regulatory practices within the construction sector.
    • Academia Analysis
  2. MRSC:
    • Who’s the Boss? Separation of Powers in Local Government: This article explores the separation of powers within local governments and the interactions between legislative and executive branches. It highlights how political influences can affect policy implementation and decision-making processes within municipal departments.
    • MRSC
  3. Town of Islip:
    • Building Division (Islip, NY): Provides an example of the responsibilities and operations of a building division within a municipal government, illustrating how political influences and fund management practices can impact local building departments.
    • Town of Islip
  4. Coates' Canons: NC Local Government Law:
    • Transferring Money from an Enterprise Fund: Authority, Limitations, and Consequences: This article discusses the legal framework and implications of transferring funds from enterprise funds to the general fund in local governments, including potential negative effects on the services funded by these transfers.
    • Coates' Canons
  5. Superfast CPA:
    • What is the General Fund in Governmental Accounting?: An overview of the general fund in governmental accounting, including challenges and issues related to fund allocations, political influences, and transparency measures.
    • Superfast CPA
  6. American Accounting Association:
    • The Use of Inter-Fund Transfers to Manage the “Bottom Line” in the Municipal Context: This paper examines how municipalities use inter-fund transfers to manage financial reporting and the potential consequences of such practices on municipal operations and financial health.
    • American Accounting Association
  7. Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA):
    • Fund Balance Guidelines for the General Fund: Provides best practices for maintaining adequate fund balances in the general fund, highlighting the importance of long-term financial planning and transparency to ensure fiscal stability.
    • GFOA
I experienced direct interaction by politicians just a few times. They were somehow reluctant to approach me. The few that did were spanked by bigger politicians. That’s not to say that I escaped political pressure. The members of the Board Of Supervisors of Los Angeles County knew my name.
Last edited:
I had an issue when I worked in Florida where a newly elected county commissioner who was also employed in upper management of a very large company went in to our sub-office in that town and talked to the permit tech "not as a county commissioner but as a concerned employee of the company". We where reviewing a 40 million dollar project they where going to construct. Long story short I took my concerns to the county administrator along with a newly enacted FL statue. After that the county attorney would remind the elected officials every year that their attempt to influence building department employees was against the law.

468.629 Prohibitions; penalties.—
(1) No person may:
(a) Falsely hold himself or herself out as a certificateholder.
(b) Falsely impersonate a certificateholder.
(c) Present as his or her own the certificate of another.
(d) Give false or forged evidence to the board or the department, or a member, an employee, or an officer thereof, for the purpose of obtaining a certificate.
(e) Use or attempt to use a certificate which has been suspended or revoked.
(f) Threaten, coerce, trick, persuade, or otherwise influence, or attempt to threaten, coerce, trick, persuade, or otherwise influence, any certificateholder to violate any provision of this part.
(g) Offer any compensation to a certificateholder in order to induce a violation of this part, a local building code or ordinance, or another law of this state.
(2) Any person who violates any provision of this part commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Any person who violates any provision of this part after a previous conviction for such violation commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.