• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Thread closed

padlock.jpg
 
Posting any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.
 
mark handler said:
Posting any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.
If that is ture why was garden roof closed?
 
Who makes that censorship call the Moderator?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes............a moderator makes the decision. And, so far that I have seen on these forums........mod's have been pretty patient. When a thread goes out of control, and has obviously outlived it's usefullness, sometimes it needs to be shut down. Some folks don't know how to let it go.

And, I know this in reference to your original thread on garden roofs, I should have let it go sooner myself. I agreed with the mod's decision to lock it.
 
Fatboy,

This is what is lost in e-mails and on any bb is you don't have the face to face.

I don't know who closed the garden roof but from where I'm coming from is.

I only use this BB as a tool to help me be the best Building Inspector I can and to help answer questions for people in the field and on this board.

The way I do it is to be consistent and fair and learn along the way.

To be a Moderator on this BB is a lot like being an Inspector and what I was saying was a nice way would be to have a 3rd party make the call so there wouldn't be any conflict of interest.
 
* * * *

Bootleg,



In the interest of clarity, can you please explain what is meant by a

"3rd party"? I thought ' moderators ' were the final say so

[ besides Jeff ] on this forum. Are you saying that someone besides

moderators should have the final word on closing / not closing topics?

Thanks! :cool:



* * * *
 
in my opinion, Mod's are the 'third-party".

Myself, I would never think of closing a thread that I was actively participating in.

I doubt you could get someone who didn't participate in this BB to do ony sort of moderating.

JMHO
 
north star said:
* * * *Bootleg,



In the interest of clarity, can you please explain what is meant by a

"3rd party"? I thought ' moderators ' were the final say so

[ besides Jeff ] on this forum. Are you saying that someone besides

moderators should have the final word on closing / not closing topics?

Thanks! :cool:



* * * *
North Star,

A 3rd party would be a Moderator that didn't have a post/reply on the thread that the moderator closed.

Just to add it sounds like that is the way it is done already.
 
Back
Top