• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Top 5 Myths About Building Departments — Debunked and Explained

Building Departments take a lot of heat, often from people who misunderstand how the process works. Whether it's plan review, inspections, or permit intake, there's a perception that the department is out to slow things down or make life difficult. That couldn't be further from the truth. Here's a breakdown of six common myths, why they persist, and what the reality actually looks like.


Myth #1: "Plan reviewers love rejecting plans."

Not true. In fact, most plan reviewers want to approve your submittal the first time. It's faster, more efficient, and far less work. When a set of plans doesn't meet code, the reviewer has to research, cite violations, document everything, and wait for corrections. Nobody benefits from that delay. The best-case scenario for everyone is a complete and code-compliant set of plans on the first round.

Reality: If your plans keep getting flagged for the same types of issues, it might be time to revisit your design process or check how your team prepares submittals.


Myth #2: "Inspectors fail jobs to feel powerful or important."

Let’s be real. Failing inspections means more time on-site, more documentation, and more conversations with frustrated contractors. Most inspectors would prefer to walk in, see everything built to code, and sign off. They don’t make the rules — they enforce them. And failing an inspection isn’t a personal decision, it’s a professional one.

Reality: The fastest way to pass inspections consistently is to follow the approved plans, ask questions when something’s unclear, and keep the jobsite ready and accessible.


Myth #3: "Permit Technicians are just paper-pushers."

Permit Techs are often the most overlooked professionals in the building process. They’re trained, they know the local code processes, and they’re the ones who ensure your submittal is complete and routed properly. They don’t just stamp papers; they troubleshoot submittals, help customers navigate regulations, and act as a liaison between you and the rest of the department.

Reality: A competent Permit Tech can save your submittal from hitting a wall. If you’re not getting things through intake smoothly, try working with them instead of venting at them.


Myth #4: "The department is deliberately slowing down my project."

Most building departments are under-resourced and overworked. There’s a good chance your reviewer or inspector is juggling dozens of other submittals or stops that same day. Incomplete applications, missing documents, or delayed responses from the applicant cause far more slowdowns than anything the department is doing.

Reality: Want faster turnaround? Submit a complete application, answer requests for info promptly, and make sure your design team is coordinated.


Myth #5: "Permit fees are just a cash grab for the town or city."

This one is flat-out wrong. By law in many states, building permit fees must be used to fund building department operations. That includes staff salaries, software systems, vehicles, and third-party consultants if needed. When a department runs efficiently, those funds are put back into faster service and better customer support.

Reality: If you’re unhappy with how fees are being spent, talk to your local council or elected officials. The building department doesn’t set the rules — they follow them.


Bottom Line:

Most building department staff are doing their best within the framework they’ve been given. They want to help you succeed. But that doesn’t mean they can ignore code requirements, rubber-stamp incomplete plans, or look the other way on safety issues. Respect the process, ask questions when needed, and understand that everyone benefits when we build it right the first time.

Got another myth worth busting? Drop it in the thread.
 
Myth #2: "Inspectors fail jobs to feel powerful or important."
That is not entirely true nor is it entirely false. I have witnessed enough inspectors on the high horse and on the take.
 
There are outliers in every field, but that does not make them the norm or majority.
When I worked in a jurisdiction that had hundreds of inspectors I reckon fifteen percent were self-important and took pleasure in being a bully. When I worked in small jurisdictions that had five or six inspectors that percentage was twenty to one hundred.

The outstanding myth relative to inspectors is that they will ensure that the construction meets the codes and construction documents. Some will, some can, some won’t, some can’t. It’s a crap shoot and the odds are not in the public’s favor.
 
Pulling a permit is a process just like getting your drivers license, you can make it easy or you can make it hard for yourself.

I need a few items to process a permit and the average Joe has no clue, so the Permit Tech is there for that reason in most cases. So you that have a PT, give "em" a fist pump today and tell them how important they are to the process! Make sure you have funds for training, they could eventually be your best next candidate for inspector.

Jar, you're spot on
 
I regularly attend hearings of the local design review board. The vast majority of cases are people who got cited by code enforcement for bootlegged window replacements and tall fence installations in front yards. The building and planning departments are already viewed as an unwelcome intruder on an otherwise simple process.
But how were they to know otherwise? Most homeowners think building departments are solely associated with adding square footage to a house. In SCBO1’s post he makes the analogy to getting a driver’s license. But most people interact with the DMV multiple times in their lifetime, enough so that they at least have some expectations as to what is required for their next visit, and what it takes to get a driver’s license, by age 16. Most homeowners will not encounter the building department until later in life.

The home improvement stores would never add a sign on their window aisle saying “BUILDING PERMITS REQUIRED TO REPLACE WINDOWS”. Just outside those stores, the city either winks at or tacitly supports Day Labor pickup spots, clearly intending to violate Worker’s Comp laws.
So everyone, even the cities themselves, already recognize that much of the residential construction/improvement industry already operates outside of interactions with a building department. And the majority of those interactions do not result in injury or loss of life, so there is little public impetus to tighten up enforcement. Under those circumstances, it’s a major PR issue for building departments, who are viewed largely as obstacles or necessary evils rather than as partners in ensuring success.
 
Which is it? Am I a lazy government employee or just making more work for all of us? LOL
The inspectors that frequent this forum are not representative of what goes on in the wild. I am convinced that most of them know the truth about that.
 
The home improvement stores would never add a sign on their window aisle saying “BUILDING PERMITS REQUIRED TO REPLACE WINDOWS”. Just outside those stores, the city either winks at or tacitly supports Day Labor pickup spots, clearly intending to violate Worker’s Comp laws.
So everyone, even the cities themselves, already recognize that much of the residential construction/improvement industry already operates outside of interactions with a building department. And the majority of those interactions do not result in injury or loss of life, so there is little public impetus to tighten up enforcement. Under those circumstances, it’s a major PR issue for building departments, who are viewed largely as obstacles or necessary evils rather than as partners in ensuring success.
I just ordered a new security system for my house. During the conversation they went through a series of things to take note of. One of them was that I might get a discount on my insurance. Another was that I needed to check with my local building department to see if I needed a permit. She said it is rare, but worth the call.
 
She said it is rare, but worth the call.
You never know what a building dept might ask for. We did a Pex repipe. I called the Building Dept to find out what is required to obtain an owner builder permit. I was told that I need to bring proof of ownership and an isometric drawing of the plumbing system. Our home has four complete bathrooms, kitchen and laundry and the City wanted an isometric drawing "so that the inspector would know what he was looking at".
I guess that this is their way of saying that they don't issue a permit for a PEX repipe. Well they didn't issue a permit to me.
 
Back
Top