• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Two-Family Wall Separation

PhilC

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
1
A two family dwelling offers some breaks in fire separation requirements per section R317.1 of IRC2006 when compared to townhome requirements of of R317.2. The townhome section makes specific reference to continuity and exterior walls requirements of R302 because they are always considered seperate buildings. The two-family dwelling section makes no such reference leading me to believe that R302 is primarily directed at townhomes. Can we assume that a two family dwelling, even with a zero lot line (non condo/private ownership), is exempt from section R302 exterior walls? Probably not, but it does not seem to be well documented and it seems odd that arbitrary property lines affect life safety mandates. Thanks
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

My question would be could this be due to the abilities to have more than two dwellings in the townhouse whereas only two are permitted as defined for 1-2 family dwellings and the increased risk associated to multiple hazard?
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

While the language is different, I think the intent is the same.

R317.1 said:
Dwelling units in two-family dwellings shall be separated from each other...
Fundamentally, this does not prescribe such separation to occur only at the interface where the dwelling units are in physical contact.
R317.1 said:
...wall assemblies shall extend and be tight against the exterior wall, and wall assemblies shall extend to the underside of roof sheathing.
This seems to describe continuity similar to that found in R317.2.1.If the code anticipates two-family dwellings to be zero-lot-line, then Table R302.1 could also be considered to prescribe a 1-hour for the wall separating the units.

The "break" for not being a townhome appears to be a 1-hour wall versus a 2-hour wall as prescribed for townhomes.
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

PhilC said:
A two family dwelling offers some breaks in fire separation requirements per section R317.1 of IRC2006 when compared to townhome requirements of of R317.2. The townhome section makes specific reference to continuity and exterior walls requirements of R302 because they are always considered seperate buildings. The two-family dwelling section makes no such reference leading me to believe that R302 is primarily directed at townhomes. Can we assume that a two family dwelling, even with a zero lot line (non condo/private ownership), is exempt from section R302 exterior walls? Probably not, but it does not seem to be well documented and it seems odd that arbitrary property lines affect life safety mandates. Thanks
The answer is in the definition of FSD:

FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE. The distance measured from the building face to one of the following:

1. To the closest interior lot line; or

2. To the centerline of a street, an alley or public way; or

3. To an imaginary line between two buildings on the lot.

The distance shall be measured at a right angle from the face of the wall.

The entire two family dwelling is a single building. Use 317.1 for the separation wall between dwelling units in a two family dwelling. Use 302 for the FSD to the exterior walls of adjacent buildings.

Each dwelling unit in a townhouse is a building. Use 302 as modified by 317.2 for the FSD to all walls separating dwelling units in a townhouse, and the FSD to all exterior walls of adjacent buildings.

In my opinion fire spread would effect more dwellings in a townhouse thus the greater protection required.
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

FWIW I think "townhouses" are meant be sold to individual owners, and have property lines between the units, thus the distance separations and higher exterior wall resistance ratings.

Although not explicitly clear, the terms in 317.1 "Two family dwellings" read as if two-family dwellings pose a lesser spread-of-fire hazard, or are not intended to have property lines between the units. In the event they are sold to separate owners, I guess that's all the fire resistance they get!
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

Two Family Dwellings unlike Townhouses can be stacked.

The requirement is one hour between dwellings regardless of if the separation is horizontal or vertical or both.

Fire separation distance does not enter into it.

And Yes...the requirements are less stringent than for Townhouses.
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

"townhouses" are meant be sold to individual owners, and have property lines between the units,
Under the IRC there is NO requirement for for a property line between Townhouses.

3 units or more non-stacked much like the old ROW house developments.

The 2 hour common wall or 2 one-hour walls required to extend to the roof deck and exterior walls is nothing more than creating smaller fire areas using a fire barrrier wall as outlined in the IBC.
 
Re: Two-Family Wall Separation

brudgers said:
Two Family Dwellings unlike Townhouses can be stacked.
Correct

brudgers said:
The requirement is one hour between dwellings regardless of if the separation is horizontal or vertical or both.
Correct
brudgers said:
Fire separation distance does not enter into it.
Incorrect, go back and re-read the OP, FSD applies to the exterior walls to adjacent buildings even in a two family stacked. He asked if he could ignore FSD and with your simplistic answer he might think he could.

brudgers said:
And Yes...the requirements are less stringent than for Townhouses.
Correct
 
Top