• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

U.S. Electric Code Will Soon Ban DIY EV Charger Installs? (Motor Trend article)

Yikes

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
4,070
Location
Southern California

U.S. Electric Code Will Soon Ban DIY EV Charger Installs

Making it illegal for homeowners to install their own EV chargers could actually undermine safety rather than improve it.
Eric Tingwall | Writer | Motor Trend Staff Photographer | Jun 20, 2025

So, with the 2026 edition of the National Electrical Code approved as proposed, it will become illegal in coming years for many U.S. homeowners to install their own EV chargers. The only thing that could have stopped this from happening was a last-chance motion to strike the clause from the code at the National Fire Protection Association’s annual technical meeting on Friday, June 20, 2025.

The change stems from a new addition to the 2026 NEC that reads, “Permanently installed electric vehicle power transfer system equipment shall be installed by qualified persons.” As proposed and ratified, the 2026 NEC defines a qualified person in vague terms likely to be interpreted by states and code enforcement departments to mean a licensed electrician.

The problem with the proposed language is that making do-it-yourself installations illegal doesn’t necessarily stop homeowners from doing their own electrical work. It does guarantee, however, that any EV chargers put in by amateurs will be installed without the appropriate permit and the accompanying safety inspection.

On Friday, NFPA members voted on a motion to erase the qualified person requirement from the 2026 NEC. That motion failed, so the proposed language will become official code. The National Electric Code eventually becomes law when it’s adopted by individual states. Legislatures can choose to modify or exclude certain sections (or even ignore the latest edition entirely), but many approve it with few or no changes.

The drive to reject the qualified installer provision had public support of the Electric Vehicle Charging Association, home-charger company Emporia, and other charging stakeholders. The companies signed a letter that states, “To ensure safety the goal should be that homeowners get a local building permit, and have their work inspected. Article 625.4 creates a new barrier to getting such a permit, and has a perverse incentive for the homeowner to lie and say they are installing a receptacle for a non-EV purpose.”

The second part of that statement alludes to a back door homeowners could use to permit their EV charger installations in the future. Because there is no qualified person requirement for residential installation of devices such as water heaters and stoves, a DIYer could install a NEMA 14-50 outlet claiming they plan to use it for a welder and then plug in an EV charger after final inspection.

1750800564721.png

The letter signed by Rivian also raises concerns that the above workaround creates a disincentive for hard-wiring EV chargers, which charging experts agree is safer than using plug-in units. Cheap 240-volt outlets are susceptible to overheating, which can start a fire.

NFPA members also decided Friday that the 2026 NEC will not incorporate a second change that could make EV charging at home and at public stations less reliable. As we wrote in January, the proposed revisions require a ground-fault circuit interrupter with a five-milliamp trip threshold on every EV charging circuit. This would be in addition to the charge circuit interrupting device already built into every EV charger. On a high-power circuit like an EV charger, the low five-milliamp threshold will lead to frequent (and unnecessary) “nuisance trips” caused by wet cables or standard charging behavior. Restoring electricity to the charger in these situation will likely require someone to reset the GFCI at the panel, which is often behind a locked door for public chargers.

As with the qualified installer requirement, the GFCI addition was being contested at the NFPA annual technical meeting with a motion to remove it. Tesla, Rivian, ChargePoint, EVgo, and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents dozens of automakers and suppliers, have all signed a letter of support for the motion, which ultimately failed, too.

Correction: We originally reported that Rivian supported eliminating the qualified installer requirement based on a draft letter of support viewed by MotorTrend. We reached out to Rivian for confirmation of its position three days prior to publishing this story, but only received a response after it went live. Rivian has not taken a public position on the qualified installer addition to the NEC.
 
U.S. Electric Code Will Soon Ban DIY EV Charger Installs
Very mis-leading and inaccurate headline

“Permanently installed electric vehicle power transfer system equipment shall be installed by qualified persons.”

An EVPE is a lot more than just a charger.

"Another recent development requiring adaptation of the NEC is EV Power Export and Bidirectional Current Flow. What this means is that in addition to being recharged by premises wiring, an electric vehicle can act as an alternate power source for premises wiring or other outlets when the primary current source is not available. The Informational Note provided for the definition of EVPE reminds us that these are sometimes referred to as bidirectional EVSE (electric vehicle service equipment)."

Acronym School

There are a lot of abbreviations in Article 625. Perhaps a brief acronym primer would be helpful. 

  • EVSE (Electric Vehicle Service Equipment)
  • EVPE (Electric Vehicle Power Export Equipment)
  • WPT (Wireless Power Transfer)
  • WPTE (Wireless Power Transfer Equipment)
 
From the article - "As proposed and ratified, the 2026 NEC defines a qualified person in vague terms likely to be interpreted by states and code enforcement departments to mean a licensed electrician."

No, it is not. Every single AHJ in the nation will interpret that to mean whatever process they already use or want to use. That is why the language is so vague.
 
From the article - "As proposed and ratified, the 2026 NEC defines a qualified person in vague terms likely to be interpreted by states and code enforcement departments to mean a licensed electrician."

No, it is not. Every single AHJ in the nation will interpret that to mean whatever process they already use or want to use. That is why the language is so vague.
Right...either you allow unlicensed people to do electrical work or you don't.....We allow homeowners to everything in CT.....It's great when I am at home....sucks a little from 9-5...
 
Here is what the state limits home owners when installing alternate energy source systems. A separate permit is required by a licensed electrician if the energy source feeds back into the power grid.

**Does this project consist of, or include an Alternative Energy Source? Yes No•
If yes, please answer the following additional questions:
Which type of alternative energy? Solar Wind Hydro.
If solar project, please select one: Micro Inverter/ AC Module System PV String System

**IF energy source goes back into the power grid, a licensed electrical contractor must pull a separate permit for the final connection to power source**

**Applications must be signed and dated by the homeowner who is personally performing the electrical work**
 
**IF energy source goes back into the power grid, a licensed electrical contractor must pull a separate permit for the final connection power source**
Totally makes sense.

Maybe an (imperfect) analogy for the Motor Trend author is: if your going to send gas from your car’s tank back into the gas station’s tanks, you’d better let the gas station employee handle it.
 
**IF energy source goes back into the power grid, a licensed electrical contractor must pull a separate permit for the final connection to power source**
The NEC's definition of "qualified person" does not mention licensure:

2026 NEC Second Draft: "Qualified Person: One who has skills and knowledge related to the construction, operation, and installation of electrical equipment and has received safety training to recognize and avoid the hazards involved. (CMP-1)"

Seems to me there are some qualified but not licensed people, as well as some licensed but not qualified people.

690.4(C) has required that PV systems "shall be performed only by qualified persons" since at least the 2017 NEC (possibly longer, didn't check)

Cheers, Wayne
 
Back
Top