Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
IIIB?Why are the exterior walls 2-hr rated? Generally, this is the most intriguing element to me - having 2-hr rated walls, I can't imagine why the exterior window openings are not rated irrespective of the horizontal continuity of the fire wall assembly.
Perhaps...although fairly uncommon for an apartment building I would say.IIIB?
We get some old mill building conversions....Perhaps...although fairly uncommon for an apartment building I would say.
Short answer...yes....if you meet the requirements...With the extension you will meet the 180 exception and then it is just the termination...Just trying to stop it from burning "around the corner/ end" of the FW...In the following snippet, are the windows marked "C" allowed to be unprotected?
View attachment 11537
The exterior walls are 2-hr for type IIIA construction. The openings do not require protection unless required by some other section of code (like 705).From my above posting of the applicable code sections, there are a couple of options depending on some additional information that is needed.
What construction type is used, and do the exterior walls use combustible exterior sheathing?
Why are the exterior walls 2-hr rated? Generally, this is the most intriguing element to me - having 2-hr rated walls, I can't imagine why the exterior window openings are not rated irrespective of the horizontal continuity of the fire wall assembly.
Ok, so the 2-hr walls take care of the Type III-A construction. Assuming sufficient FSD, likely no requirement for protected openings from 705.8.The exterior walls are 2-hr for type IIIA construction. The openings do not require protection unless required by some other section of code (like 705).
It is the language of 706.5.1 that confuses me, specifically the 180° language. From everything outside of the code that I have read the windows do not need protection, but just taking the code language into account I'm not as sure.
2021 IBC
706.5 Horizontal Continuity
Fire walls shall be continuous from exterior wall to exterior wall and shall extend not less than 18 inches (457 mm) beyond the exterior surface of exterior walls.
Exceptions:
- Fire walls shall be permitted to terminate at the interior surface of combustible exterior sheathing or siding provided that the exterior wall has a fire-resistance rating of not less than 1 hour for a horizontal distance of not less than 4 feet (1220 mm) on both sides of the fire wall. Openings within such exterior walls shall be protected by opening protectives having a fire protection rating of not less than 3/4 hour.
- Fire walls shall be permitted to terminate at the interior surface of noncombustible exterior sheathing, exterior siding or other noncombustible exterior finishes provided that the sheathing, siding or other exterior noncombustible finish extends a horizontal distance of not less than 4 feet (1220 mm) on both sides of the fire wall.
- Fire walls shall be permitted to terminate at the interior surface of noncombustible exterior sheathing where the building on each side of the fire wall is protected by an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
706.5.1 Exterior Walls
Where the fire wall intersects exterior walls, the fire-resistance rating and opening protection of the exterior walls shall comply with one of the following:
- The exterior walls on both sides of the fire wall shall have a 1-hour fire-resistance rating with 3/4-hour protection where opening protection is required by Section 705.8. The fire-resistance rating of the exterior wall shall extend not less than 4 feet (1220 mm) on each side of the intersection of the fire wall to exterior wall. Exterior wall intersections at fire walls that form an angle equal to or greater than 180 degrees (3.14 rad) do not need exterior wall protection.
- Buildings or spaces on both sides of the intersecting fire wall shall assume to have an imaginary lot line at the fire wall and extending beyond the exterior of the fire wall. The location of the assumed line in relation to the exterior walls and the fire wall shall be such that the exterior wall and opening protection meet the requirements set forth in Sections 705.5 and 705.8. Such protection is not required for exterior walls terminating at fire walls that form an angle equal to or greater than 180 degrees (3.14 rad).
FSD not an issue, NFPA 13 system, FRTW sheathing and framing for exterior walls. My confusion stems from the illustrations provided by the commentary, but I'm not sure they apply if the fire wall extends out to the end. I'm thinking not now. I read it over and over and still think it could be clearer.Ok, so the 2-hr walls take care of the Type III-A construction. Assuming sufficient FSD, likely no requirement for protected openings from 705.8.
Next part to consider is 706.5. Given the residential use, I presume that you have an automatic sprinkler system, either 13 or 13R? Thus, Exception #3 to 706.5 is likely the design basis.
Final part to consider is 706.5.1. Design basis here is likely condition #2. Per the image presented, it appears that this works.
So in summary, I think you are correct in assessing that the windows are permitted to be unprotected.
FRTW is not non-combustible. It has limited ability to ignite, but is not non-combustible.FRTW sheathing
Fire walls shall be permitted to terminate at the interior surface of combustible exterior sheathing or siding provided that the exterior wall has a fire-resistance rating of not less than 1 hour for a horizontal distance of not less than 4 feet (1220 mm) on both sides of the fire wall. Openings within such exterior walls shall be protected by opening protectives having a fire protection rating of not less than 3/4 hour.
The FRTW sheathing works fine for Type III-A per 602.3, but as you read that section, take note that even therein it differentiates FRTW from noncombustible.FRTW is not non-combustible. It has limited ability to ignite, but is not non-combustible.
IMHO, you need to follow Exception #1 to 706.5 and have 3/4-hr opening protectives.
I would only take it in the context of 602.3 or where permitted by Section 603.I read it. And I questioned (myself) as to 706.5, but my conclusion has been that it is considered as a substitute for non-combustible in type III construction. Is it not? Am I reading it as a blanket substitution when it should not be in the context of 706.5.? If I am, I think a lot of other people are too.