jar546
CBO
You do this of course. Remember when......
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Absolutely not. The paper is never required to cover the face/edge of the joist/stud. Except for the joist bay that has the fan in it, the others are installed upside-down anyway.north star said:* * * *Shouldn't the paper on that thermal insulation overlap on to the individual
joist / studs and be attached to them?.....Also, shouldn't the lengths of
insulation be one continuous length?
* * * *
It can be but the code does not require it. Drywall contractors who glue an screw will hate you if you do it.north star said:* * * *Jeff,
In reading some of the manufacturer's literature, the thermal insulation
can be inserted in to the individual cavities or stapled to the framing
( see the attached link to Johns-Manville - Installation Guide for one
of their products ).
http://www.specjm.com/files/pdf/bid0016.pdf
![]()
* * * *
That ship has already sailed!It can be but the code does not require it. Drywall contractors who glue an screw will hate you if you do it.
YesAlso, manufacturer's specs can get 'em off the hook, no?
I don't like it either but like most products it will have a warning label about as effective as "Danger Will Robinson Danger"fiddler said:Personally I really hate that addition to the code. There is no way to ensure that future owners of the house will have a dryer with the same capacity. Or for that matter when the existing owners replace said dryer.
You can look at it that way to give the perception that it is not a big deal.mark handler said:http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/Residential_Structure_and_Building_Fires.pdfLess than 5 % of reported residential fires (2005) are attributed to Laundry areas
I did not say that was a good or bad number. Zero would be a good number.jar546 said:You can look at it that way to give the perception that it is not a big deal.5% of the total fires IS a big number and can be preventable. That is the reality. I would think most of these issues are maintenance related.