• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Latest activity

  • Joe.B
    Joe.B reacted to steveray's post in the thread Windows/guards under 9.8.8.1 with Like Like.
    I have a bad habit of that....Given a choice between burning to death and almost any other thing....I am going for option B....
  • steveray
    steveray replied to the thread Windows/guards under 9.8.8.1.
    I have a bad habit of that....Given a choice between burning to death and almost any other thing....I am going for option B....
  • Joe.B
    Great video. Great information and I hope people watch it. My thoughts? One of the best pieces of advice he gave is that sometimes, the...
  • S
    SDS replied to the thread That's a stretch..
    $100 and a bottle of Jose Cuervo says so...
  • ICE
    Does the connection between the two render the structure on the left an addition to the structure on the right?
    • IMG_0022.JPG
  • ICE
    ICE replied to the thread An average day.
    If you encounter this, are you sure that a real inspector was there?
    • IMG_6569.JPG
  • BN4537
    Make them put it on the roof (or on a balcony), mounted on a rack if there is no available wall. Conductors on secondary side of POCO...
  • steveray
    steveray reacted to Joe.B's post in the thread Weak Deck with Like Like.
    I guess this isn't technically code unless the local AHJ adopts it. But here's one:
  • jar546
    So the issue is that there may be an option for flood proofing the room to at least 1 foot above base flat elevation. The other issue is...
  • W
    My thoughts as a non-building official… Sounds like the new equipment makes for a safer installation so that’s very desirable, even if...
  • ICE
    ICE replied to the thread Trapeze..
    I suppose it crossed their minds and that qualifies as "considered". The load is not that great and it is spread out.
  • Joe.B
    Joe.B replied to the thread Switchgear Replacement (Real Life).
    What does your existing building code say in 115? Specifically, do you have: [A] 115.5 Restoration or abatement. The structure or...
  • ICE
    ICE replied to the thread Trapeze..
    Right you are. I should have said "Not secured in five of six directions."
  • Joe.B
    Joe.B replied to the thread Weak Deck.
    I guess this isn't technically code unless the local AHJ adopts it. But here's one:
    • 1760024851019.png
    • 1760024871470.png
    • 1760024964772.png
  • steveray
    If it is not an increase in hazard (more Amps or worse clearance sort of) I say replace it in place as is...Flood gets weird...
Back
Top