Hello all,
I had been discussing this building project in another thread with regard to fire separation distance...I am now here looking for some guidance with regard to construction type. Mentioning in case this project looks familiar to some.
Essentially, my question is this: With a mixed use building, does one look at each use individually in order to analyze maximum floor areas and heights per Table 506.2 or is there another method, like adding up all floor areas for each use, and then using the most stringent condition (floor area) to determine Construction Type per Table 506.2?
New 11,000 s.f. two-story, mixed use building will connect to an existing 1,800 s.f. building. No access between buildings, they just connect primarily for aesthetic reasons. Same lot, same owner. This is a non-public catering facility first floor with private offices on second floor.
Total new floor area is 11,000 s.f. as follows, total of both floors:
"F1" use - 3,400 s.f.
"B" use - 6,000 s.f.
"S2" use - 1,600 s,f,
If I add the existing building in order to analyze them as one building that adds 1,800 s.f. of "B" use, still below the requirements to classify this as 5B and not need a sprinkler system, from what I can tell. For example, non sprinklered B use is max 9,000 s.f. for 5B construction and I have 7,800 s.f.
As you can see from the areas above, I am below what seems to be the most stringent requirements of table 506.2 if I am in fact looking at the most stringent use, and also below the height limitation as this building is about 33 feet tall.
I realize I will need some rated walls where connecting to the existing building and also adjacent to a new exterior exit access stair from the second floor to grade.
Thus, it would seem I am ok with looking at this entire assembly as one building and ok with no sprinklers. In particular, the Fire Protection Systems chapter mentions some exceptions for sprinklers in F1 under 903.2.4 (Sprinklers needed if floor area exceeds 12,000 sf) . Same for other uses in that chapter.
Appreciate your insight.
Thanks
I had been discussing this building project in another thread with regard to fire separation distance...I am now here looking for some guidance with regard to construction type. Mentioning in case this project looks familiar to some.
Essentially, my question is this: With a mixed use building, does one look at each use individually in order to analyze maximum floor areas and heights per Table 506.2 or is there another method, like adding up all floor areas for each use, and then using the most stringent condition (floor area) to determine Construction Type per Table 506.2?
New 11,000 s.f. two-story, mixed use building will connect to an existing 1,800 s.f. building. No access between buildings, they just connect primarily for aesthetic reasons. Same lot, same owner. This is a non-public catering facility first floor with private offices on second floor.
Total new floor area is 11,000 s.f. as follows, total of both floors:
"F1" use - 3,400 s.f.
"B" use - 6,000 s.f.
"S2" use - 1,600 s,f,
If I add the existing building in order to analyze them as one building that adds 1,800 s.f. of "B" use, still below the requirements to classify this as 5B and not need a sprinkler system, from what I can tell. For example, non sprinklered B use is max 9,000 s.f. for 5B construction and I have 7,800 s.f.
As you can see from the areas above, I am below what seems to be the most stringent requirements of table 506.2 if I am in fact looking at the most stringent use, and also below the height limitation as this building is about 33 feet tall.
I realize I will need some rated walls where connecting to the existing building and also adjacent to a new exterior exit access stair from the second floor to grade.
Thus, it would seem I am ok with looking at this entire assembly as one building and ok with no sprinklers. In particular, the Fire Protection Systems chapter mentions some exceptions for sprinklers in F1 under 903.2.4 (Sprinklers needed if floor area exceeds 12,000 sf) . Same for other uses in that chapter.
Appreciate your insight.
Thanks