• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Is a Huddle Room a Conference Room?

Tim Mailloux

REGISTERED
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
977
Location
Hartford CT
I'm dealing with a corporate client that has spaces in their typical program they refer to as Huddle spaces. These are small 120SF rooms with a table and 6 chairs for people to get together and meet. This same client also like to dense pack their floor plates with small benching work stations and providing 8 to 10 of these huddle rooms per floor. The same floor with also have several conference rooms which are only different from the huddle rooms due to their larger size.


Given the small dense pack nature of the work stations, all these small Huddle rooms and the conference rooms, we routinely run into problems with existing stairs not being able to support the calculated occupant loads and we then have to tell our client they have to give up some program. In this scenario I have been calculating these huddle rooms the same as conference rooms with an assembly tables and chairs function at a ratio of 1 person per 15 SF. These huddle rooms are basically small conference rooms and if it looks like a duck its probably a duck.


The counter argument that is being made to my interpretation goes as follows, these small huddle rooms are only used by occupants already on the floor and should be included in the business function of space at ratio of 1 per 100SF. And that counting them as 1 per 15 conference room double counts the occupants and over populates the floor.
 
It is a duck
Regarding the operation on a whole;
Also of concern is are they over in occupancy?
Density? Exiting? Corridors? Door swings?
Door widths?
 
The 2018 has changed the OL for businesses where you can use between 50 to 150 sq ft per person. I really do not see a problem with calculating the OL based on the stair width and post it that way and be done with it. Businesses change how they operate all the time and we are not there to regulate the very specifics only the generalities. operqation
2018 IBC

Business areas 150 gross
Concentrated business use areas See Section 1004.8

1004.3 Multiple function occupant load.
Where an area under consideration contains multiple functions having different occupant load factors, the design occupant load for such area shall be based on the floor area of each function calculated independently.


1004.8 Concentrated business use areas.
The occupant load factor for concentrated business use shall be applied to telephone call centers, trading floors, electronic data processing centers and similar business use areas with a higher density of occupants than would normally be expected in a typical business occupancy environment. Where approved by the building official, the occupant load for concentrated business use areas shall be the actual occupant load, but not less than one occupant per 50 square feet (4.65 m2) of gross occupiable floor space.
 
It is a duck
Regarding the operation on a hole;
Also of concern is are they over in occupancy?
Density? Exiting? Corridors? Door swings?
Door widths?

The only issues we ever run into with this client are the stairs. The older high rise buildings in my area were not designed with stairs large enough to handle modern open office densities.
 
The 2018 has changed the OL for businesses where you can use between 50 to 150 sq ft per person. I really do not see a problem with calculating the OL based on the stair width and post it that way and be done with it. Businesses change how they operate all the time and we are not there to regulate the very specifics only the generalities. operqation
2018 IBC

Business areas 150 gross
Concentrated business use areas See Section 1004.8

1004.3 Multiple function occupant load.
Where an area under consideration contains multiple functions having different occupant load factors, the design occupant load for such area shall be based on the floor area of each function calculated independently.


1004.8 Concentrated business use areas.
The occupant load factor for concentrated business use shall be applied to telephone call centers, trading floors, electronic data processing centers and similar business use areas with a higher density of occupants than would normally be expected in a typical business occupancy environment. Where approved by the building official, the occupant load for concentrated business use areas shall be the actual occupant load, but not less than one occupant per 50 square feet (4.65 m2) of gross occupiable floor space.

I'm in CT and we are currently on the 2012 IBC with CT Amendments. CT will be adopting the 2015 IBC with state amendments this fall. We are quite a ways away from the 2018 IBC
 
I vote B-Business area @ 100 sf.

When figuring an office space I don't go to assembly in table 1004.2 for unconcentrated tables and chairs.
 
I vote B-Business area @ 100 sf.

When figuring an office space I don't go to assembly in table 1004.2 for unconcentrated tables and chairs.

how is the function of space for a conference room Business and not assembly un-concentrated table and chairs? We are not talking about occupancy / use group, but function or manner in which the space is being used.
 
Bo can approve a reduced occupant load.

Maybe show the seating on the plans, to show the intended use.

Label the room office,

Avoid the red flag words!!!!!
 
Tim, if the room is less than 750 and less than 50 OL, do it all at 100.....But if you are not going to do net, then make sure your 100 gross includes EVERYTHING...Shafts, bathrooms, corridors, etc....a reasonable BO should entertain that...Not sure about the FM though...But then again, you mention "existing", so it might go to the fire code, and if it is not in violation, then it needs no "upgrade"....

303.1.1 Small buildings and tenant spaces. A building or
tenant space used for assembly purposes with an occupant
load of less than 50 persons shall be classified as a Group B
occupancy.
303.1.2 Small assembly spaces. The following rooms and
spaces shall not be classified as Assembly occupancies:
1. A room or space used for assembly purposes with an
occupant load of less than 50 persons and accessory to
another occupancy shall be classified as a Group B
occupancy or as part of that occupancy.
2. A room or space used for assembly purposes that is less
than 750 square feet (70 m2) in area and accessory to
 
Well some Big bosses

Have Big offices, 750 sg ft or bigger

and the have meetings in them less than 50 people,

And it is still an office.
 
It has to be reduced to the most restrictive part of the means of egress or the width needs to be increased. There are no other options at this time that I see for an existing building.
 
2018 IBC

Business areas 150 gross
Concentrated business use areas See Section 1004.8

I see that the 2018 IBC if adopted by the AHJ will now get an increase, if on the 2012, it's still 100 gross.

Some city's I suspect would allow you to use the latest code, not sure if it would have to be adopted?
 
So can it be called an office?

Put a desk in the corner if needed.
I'm dealing with a corporate client that has spaces in their typical program they refer to as Huddle spaces. These are small 120SF rooms with a table and 6 chairs for people to get together and meet. This same client also like to dense pack their floor plates with small benching work stations and providing 8 to 10 of these huddle rooms per floor. The same floor with also have several conference rooms which are only different from the huddle rooms due to their larger size.


Given the small dense pack nature of the work stations, all these small Huddle rooms and the conference rooms, we routinely run into problems with existing stairs not being able to support the calculated occupant loads and we then have to tell our client they have to give up some program. In this scenario I have been calculating these huddle rooms the same as conference rooms with an assembly tables and chairs function at a ratio of 1 person per 15 SF. These huddle rooms are basically small conference rooms and if it looks like a duck its probably a duck.


The counter argument that is being made to my interpretation goes as follows, these small huddle rooms are only used by occupants already on the floor and should be included in the business function of space at ratio of 1 per 100SF. And that counting them as 1 per 15 conference room double counts the occupants and over populates the floor.



Call them offices, especially if you only show six chairs.

My bosses little 12x12 has five chairs in it at all times.

I know it is not over 750, but there is no max size on an office.
 
Last edited:
Overloading the occupancy is a violation of the fire and building codes and may not provide adequate egress in compliance with the provisions of the codes.
 
Tim, if the room is less than 750 and less than 50 OL, do it all at 100.....But if you are not going to do net, then make sure your 100 gross includes EVERYTHING...Shafts, bathrooms, corridors, etc....a reasonable BO should entertain that...Not sure about the FM though...But then again, you mention "existing", so it might go to the fire code, and if it is not in violation, then it needs no "upgrade"....

303.1.1 Small buildings and tenant spaces. A building or
tenant space used for assembly purposes with an occupant
load of less than 50 persons shall be classified as a Group B
occupancy.
303.1.2 Small assembly spaces. The following rooms and
spaces shall not be classified as Assembly occupancies:
1. A room or space used for assembly purposes with an
occupant load of less than 50 persons and accessory to
another occupancy shall be classified as a Group B
occupancy or as part of that occupancy.
2. A room or space used for assembly purposes that is less
than 750 square feet (70 m2) in area and accessory to

Sections 303.1.1 and 303.1.2 are related to occupancy / use group, and I agree that a conference room under 750 SF or under 50P is part of the business occupancy and not assembly or accessory assembly. But table 1004.1.2 is about function of space, it has nothing to do with occupancy or use group.
 
So can it be called an office?

Put a desk in the corner if needed.




Call them offices, especially if you only show six chairs.

My bosses little 12x12 has five chairs in it at all times.

I know it is not over 750, but there is no max size on an office.

There is no desk or computer in the room, it is obviously a small conference room and no B.O. in his right mind would buy it being called an office.
 
Bo can approve a reduced occupant load.

Maybe show the seating on the plans, to show the intended use.

Label the room office,

Avoid the red flag words!!!!!

in CT local building officials do not have this authority. A formal code medication request has to be made to the Office of the state building official and State Fire Marshal. I have yet to be granted one for an occupancy reduction as it relates to egress.
 
we routinely run into problems with existing stairs not being able to support the calculated occupant loads

It does not matter what the occupancy is classified as "B" or "A" the existing stair width is the limiting factor for the floor/space. Work it backwards a 44 inch stair allows 146 people per stairway. If you sprinkler the building and install an emergency voice/alarm communication system you can have 220 people per stairway. A 34 inch clear door opening serving the stair allows 170 people. Find the most restrictive egress width within the existing system and that is all that can be permitted and post it

1004.1.2 Areas without fixed seating.
The number of occupants shall be computed at the rate of one occupant per unit of area as prescribed in Table 1004.1.2. For areas without fixed seating, the occupant load shall not be less than that number determined by dividing the floor area under consideration by the occupant load factor assigned to the function of the space as set forth in Table 1004.1.2. Where an intended function is not listed in Table 1004.1.2, the building official shall establish a function based on a listed function that most nearly resembles the intended function.

Exception: Where approved by the building official, the actual number of occupants for whom each occupied space, floor or building is designed, although less than those determined by calculation, shall be permitted to be used in the determination of the design occupant load.

It is in the IBC and IFC and a BO and FO should not be afraid to use it especially in an existing building.

1005.1 General.
All portions of the means of egress system shall be sized in accordance with this section.

1005.3 Required capacity based on occupant load.
The required capacity, in inches (mm), of the means of egress for any room, area, space or story shall not be less than that determined in accordance with Sections 1005.3.1 and 1005.3.2:

1005.3.1 Stairways.
The capacity, in inches (mm), of means of egress stairways shall be calculated by multiplying the occupant load served by such stairway by a means of egress capacity factor of 0.3 inch (7.6 mm) per occupant. Where stairways serve more than one story, only the occupant load of each story considered individually shall be used in calculating the required capacity of the stairways serving that story.

Exception: For other than Group H and I-2 occupancies, the capacity, in inches (mm), of means of egress stairways shall be calculated by multiplying the occupant load served by such stairway by a means of egress capacity factor of 0.2 inch (5.1 mm) per occupant in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 and an emergency voice/alarm communication system in accordance with Section 907.5.2.2.
 
1004.1.2 Areas without fixed seating.
The number of occupants shall be computed at the rate of one occupant per unit of area as prescribed in Table 1004.1.2. For areas without fixed seating, the occupant load shall not be less than that number determined by dividing the floor area under consideration by the occupant load factor assigned to the function of the space as set forth in Table 1004.1.2. Where an intended function is not listed in Table 1004.1.2, the building official shall establish a function based on a listed function that most nearly resembles the intended function.

Exception: Where approved by the building official, the actual number of occupants for whom each occupied space, floor or building is designed, although less than those determined by calculation, shall be permitted to be used in the determination of the design occupant load.
The exception to section 1004.1.2 you reference above has been deleted from the CT Building code.
 
1005.3.1 Stairways.
The capacity, in inches (mm), of means of egress stairways shall be calculated by multiplying the occupant load served by such stairway by a means of egress capacity factor of 0.3 inch (7.6 mm) per occupant. Where stairways serve more than one story, only the occupant load of each story considered individually shall be used in calculating the required capacity of the stairways serving that story.

Exception: For other than Group H and I-2 occupancies, the capacity, in inches (mm), of means of egress stairways shall be calculated by multiplying the occupant load served by such stairway by a means of egress capacity factor of 0.2 inch (5.1 mm) per occupant in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 and an emergency voice/alarm communication system in accordance with Section 907.5.2.2.

This exception has also been deleted in CT, all stairs are calculated at the 0.3 inch factor with or without sprinklers.

We have a very tough code in CT
 
Sections 303.1.1 and 303.1.2 are related to occupancy / use group, and I agree that a conference room under 750 SF or under 50P is part of the business occupancy and not assembly or accessory assembly. But table 1004.1.2 is about function of space, it has nothing to do with occupancy or use group.

If it is not assembly then, why are you in the assembly part of Table 1004.1.2? If the "use" is not what the room is "used" for, then what is it...? They are not directly tied or mutually exclusive....Hence the use of the word reasonable....
 
If it is not assembly then, why are you in the assembly part of Table 1004.1.2? If the "use" is not what the room is "used" for, then what is it...? They are not directly tied or mutually exclusive....Hence the use of the word reasonable....

Read the code commentary for table 1004.1.2:
Table 1004.1.2 established the minimum occupant load density based on the function or actual use of the space (not use group classification).
 
Back
Top