ACDC
SAWHORSE
I am working on a 2-story triplex project reviewed under IBC (R-2, type V-B). The north and south walls of the building are between 5-10' from the side yard lot line, and therefore are required to be 1-hr rated. The building is non-sprinklered so unprotected openings in those walls are limited to 10% of the wall area.
My issue is that the code official is also requiring our covered porch to be 1-hr protected as it is in line with the north and south walls. He is requiring us to add a 1-hr rated wall at each end of the porch to achieve this. His logic is that "The roof and floor of the front porch create the building area space, and no walls there create an Opening, and Openings are regulated in table 705.8." (the porch "openings" would put us over the 10% maximum if they are considered as part of the wall area)
We just finished building the exact same design in the same city, reviewed by a different inspector and they did not require the porch fire protection. I can see the reviewer's logic but don't understand why the "wall" would be considered to include the front porch area just because there is a roof above. In essence he is requiring us to fire protect a wall that doesn't exist.
Any thoughts on how to avoid this requirement or is he correct?
My issue is that the code official is also requiring our covered porch to be 1-hr protected as it is in line with the north and south walls. He is requiring us to add a 1-hr rated wall at each end of the porch to achieve this. His logic is that "The roof and floor of the front porch create the building area space, and no walls there create an Opening, and Openings are regulated in table 705.8." (the porch "openings" would put us over the 10% maximum if they are considered as part of the wall area)
We just finished building the exact same design in the same city, reviewed by a different inspector and they did not require the porch fire protection. I can see the reviewer's logic but don't understand why the "wall" would be considered to include the front porch area just because there is a roof above. In essence he is requiring us to fire protect a wall that doesn't exist.
Any thoughts on how to avoid this requirement or is he correct?