indyarchyguy
SAWHORSE
I am currently reviewing a set of documents where a consultant had come through an existing senior health and living facility. The facility is of V-B construction. It has had several interior renovations over the many years it has been in service. This is located in Indiana. One of these renovations included the implementation of a surgical suite (7 Operating Rooms, Recovery, support areas and offices, etc.). Accordingly, there should be compartmentation between this area and the rest of the facility. This renovation occurred approximately 20 years ago. The consultant noted that while there were fire-rated partitions indicated on the drawings, they were not called out as smoke partitions.
It has always been my thought (probably incorrectly), that when you have a fire-rated partition it would be inherently a smoke-partition. If all penetrations were fire-sealed, the walls fire-sealed to deck and floor, ductwork provided with fire-dampers and doors rated with fire-seals, etc. it would already meet the requirements for smoke rating. Am I incorrect in my assumptions? I always considered the smoke rating (barrier) as less than a fire-sealed product. If it is not, what would make a rated fire-barrier a smoke-barrier as well? Please show me the way...I appreciate all your input. Thank you.
It has always been my thought (probably incorrectly), that when you have a fire-rated partition it would be inherently a smoke-partition. If all penetrations were fire-sealed, the walls fire-sealed to deck and floor, ductwork provided with fire-dampers and doors rated with fire-seals, etc. it would already meet the requirements for smoke rating. Am I incorrect in my assumptions? I always considered the smoke rating (barrier) as less than a fire-sealed product. If it is not, what would make a rated fire-barrier a smoke-barrier as well? Please show me the way...I appreciate all your input. Thank you.
Last edited: