mtlogcabin
SAWHORSE
You say I have a Logical Fallacy but you do not have an Intentional Fallacy
Asserting that everyone agrees (argumentum ad populum,
In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people")[1][a] is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so.[2]
For years the consensus was the world was flat
The climate is and has been constantly changing and there is no disagreement on that term. The big question is, is it a crisis of such a magnitude that the reduction of CO2 is imperative and must be addressed immediately without looking at the law of unintended consequences that will result from drastic changes by requiring and/or removing existing energy consumption. Also if it is a world wide problem it will need a world wide solution that is implemented world wide and not in just a few countries that can afford it.
Asserting that everyone agrees (argumentum ad populum,
In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people")[1][a] is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so.[2]
For years the consensus was the world was flat
The climate is and has been constantly changing and there is no disagreement on that term. The big question is, is it a crisis of such a magnitude that the reduction of CO2 is imperative and must be addressed immediately without looking at the law of unintended consequences that will result from drastic changes by requiring and/or removing existing energy consumption. Also if it is a world wide problem it will need a world wide solution that is implemented world wide and not in just a few countries that can afford it.