• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Building Safety vs. Political Pressure: The Tightrope of Third-Party Inspection Agencies

Yes, to keep the thread relevant to its intention rather than go off on an unrelated tangent. So yes, absolutely.
Then perhaps accept what others say, don't belittle their point of view, and maybe things will return to the intent of the thread. But if you push down someone else's valid perspective, don't be surprised when they reaffirm their point, mirroring your own action. Especially when your point is based on your perception.
 
Yep, just remember, jurisdictions are often compelled to select the lowest bidder. You get what you pay for. Not sure how the bid package would affect the permit fees?
 
Yep, just remember, jurisdictions are often compelled to select the lowest bidder. You get what you pay for. Not sure how the bid package would affect the permit fees?
It's not that easy. It should not cost the jurisdictions anything, in fact they make money on it. The 3rd party issues the permit when the applicant pays them their fee. Jurisdictions just care what their kickback is.
 
Back
Top