jar546
CBO
This poll is specific to Building Officials only. I am trying to get a sense of where most of you are when it comes to areas of responsibility. If you choose other, then please post below to explain what other means.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
In many municipalities, code enforcement/compliance has been handed over to the police department or is its own separate department.How can a building official (a.k.a. "code official") NOT check Code Compliance / Enforcement?
Yea, like all of it and then some more.This poll is specific to Building Officials only. I am trying to get a sense of where most of you are when it comes to areas of responsibility. If you choose other, then please post below to explain what other means.
An abundance of municipalities adopted the IPMC which is a code. It is becoming a standard to compliment local ordinances.Well, I checked both Building Department and Code Enforcement, because we enforce the building "code." I guess I should uncheck "Code Enforcement," because we do not enforce the zoning ordinances (which are called "regulations" here, not "code"), nor do we enforce the blight ordinance (which is called an "ordinance," not a "code").
An abundance of municipalities adopted the IPMC which is a code. It is becoming a standard to compliment local ordinances.
Ordinances are "codified" into a formal document and adopted. I never heard of an ordinance officer/official but I have heard of a code officer/official. They call it code enforcement, not ordinance enforcement. Local governments derive their authority to create and enforce ordinances from state law. This delegation of power allows municipalities to address specific needs and conditions within their boundaries, providing a legal basis for treating these ordinances as enforceable codes.
The times have changed significantly over the past few decades. Maybe in small-town America, where you have a one-stop shop where the Building Official who enforces the building codes also acts as the zoning officer and is expected to handle property maintenance issues, you can say what you are saying. However, in many municipalities across the country, things are a bit different, as you can see from the poll numbers above. Two decades ago, in Pennsylvania cities, I was providing IPMC training to their code enforcement officers who handled property maintenance issues. That was their title. Just like the jurisdictions of East Hartford & Mansfield, Connecticut, hundreds if not thousands of municipalities across the US have adopted the IPMC to address property maintenance issues. Sometimes, the Building Official is responsible in smaller one-stop shop towns, and other times, they have a separate code enforcement department with a Code Enforcement Officer, such as the one in Weston, CT.I understand your point. I was just explaining that, since my department does NOT enforce zoning or blight ordinances (and my state has not adopted the IPMC), I consider the building department to be code enforcement -- since we enforce the building code. For other stuff, towns in this state have zoning enforcement officers, inland wetlands enforcement officers, etc. -- and they are generally referred to by their job title, not as "code enforcement" officers.
But your question and this discussion points out that the nomenclature has not kept apace with reality. The "building department" enforces the building code. An alien newly arrived on earth who just learned to speak English (or American , which may or may not be English) might very understandably think that if the highway department maintains the highways, the building department must build (or at least maintain and repair) the buildings. But ... that's not what we do. That typically falls under "public works."
Isn't it great that we all speak the same language?
The times have changed significantly over the past few decades. Maybe in small-town America, where you have a one-stop shop where the Building Official who enforces the building codes also acts as the zoning officer and is expected to handle property maintenance issues, you can say what you are saying. However, in many municipalities across the country, things are a bit different, as you can see from the poll numbers above. Two decades ago, in Pennsylvania cities, I was providing IPMC training to their code enforcement officers who handled property maintenance issues. That was their title. Just like the jurisdictions of East Hartford & Mansfield, Connecticut, hundreds if not thousands of municipalities across the US have adopted the IPMC to address property maintenance issues. Sometimes, the Building Official is responsible in smaller one-stop shop towns, and other times, they have a separate code enforcement department with a Code Enforcement Officer, such as the one in Weston, CT.
You can join organizations such as the American Association of Code Enforcement (AACE), your state-level organization such as the Florida Association of Code Enforcement (FACE), or similarly named organizations in California, Colorado, Alabama, and even Connecticut, just to name a few. Their purpose is to learn property maintenance codes and the state statutes that govern the legal procedures around them. Regardless of what any state adopts, any municipality can adopt the IPMC. You say potato, and I say potato.
But the times continue to change. Many departments are changing their names to Code Compliance and have Code Compliance Officers working for them. The subtle change is to help ease perception. I am also seeing a lot of CC departments going under the police department these days. I even have one municipality where I am the BO (I cover 2), where property maintenance and code compliance are handled by the police officers.
So, at the end of the day, when you work for the Building Department and handle building codes, you are a separate entity from zoning or code enforcement. Maybe you are in charge of many departments like I am. However, these sub-departments have very different responsibilities. Unfortunately, some of the elected officials don't seem to understand it and simply think they are all the same. They are not. So, let's break this down.
Building Department: Handles building codes with a building official, plans examiners, and inspectors who oversee construction projects.
Planning and Zoning: Often, a planner or zoning officer, or both or many of each, will determine what you can build where.
Code Enforcement/Compliance: These folks enforce property maintenance ordinances and often work with the building department when they catch people working without a permit.
Don't confuse code enforcement with building code enforcement. They are different animals. The IBC only defines Building Officials but not Code Enforcement Officers because they are not the same.
But I thought you said you were not the building official for where you worked. I can't edit individual votes.Which is why I'm asking you to remove one vote for Code Compliance / Enforcement, because I checked that as well as Building Department because (to my apparently antiquated, English-speaking way of thinking) I considered them to be the same.
But I thought you said you were not the building official for where you worked. I can't edit individual votes.
Building and plumbing
Some fire code
Business licenses
Some asset management/construction contracts as relating to Town buildings.