• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Photoshop inspections?

I'm not surprised. We tried allowing roofers to submit photos because we didn't have the manpower to put someone on every roof. We got far too many photos that didn't show the entire roof, and many of them plainly didn't look at all like the house that was [purportedly] being re-roofed.

Is there no limit to greed and stupidity?
Click to expand...

Nope.
 
Yankee Chronicler said:
I'm not surprised. We tried allowing roofers to submit photos because we didn't have the manpower to put someone on every roof. We got far too many photos that didn't show the entire roof, and many of them plainly didn't look at all like the house that was [purportedly] being re-roofed.
Click to expand...
People just can't follow directions. Where I work, we have a standardized way of taking site photos. Unless the room is weirdly shaped, we should have a minimum number of photos per room. Half my team just doesn't understand how to follow what are very basic directions.
Paul Sweet said:
AI can also stand for Artificial Idiocy.
Click to expand...
Speaking of artificial idiocy, I had a co-worker that took everything ChatGPT said as gospel. Ask it a code question and whatever it spit out was "correct" because they "asked it to cite the code section it referenced". You can probably guess how that went...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top