• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

1 or 2 Permits For A New Commercial Building

A

Alias

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
1,649
Location
State of Disbelief
I have a proposal for a new USFS building here in town, 24,000 sq. ft. We had a meeting two weeks ago with the builder and their engineer to hash out the planning and zoning requirements to present to the Planning Commission. This will be a LEED certified building per the contract.

During the discussion, it was mentioned that they want to do the shell first with one permit. The shell will be a metal building with rock fascia approximately 4 foot high on all walls.

The second phase would be the TI and under a second (maybe more) permit(s). This will start after the building is built.

I have serious concerns over the whole project because of the parties involved. The last developement (mini-mall) that was done this way is still not complete 4 years later.

My questions are:

1) Can I require them to to do this under 1 permit and not multiple?

2) As this is a LEED certified building, doesn't it need to be under one permit to get the LEED certification?

Thanks in advance for your input.
 
2...not sure

1...A real PITA sometimes...read MOST OF THE TIME....if they want to do the WHOLE shell first, not so bad, but what happens is at least two of every contractor, who is responsible for what parts, egress and such may change when fitout occurs...Also, once the shell is built, the fitouts can be done under IEBC...which is a whole other problem....

I am definetly not a fan...of the two permits, and if you have political support from above, you can require one submission at least for the fist tennant and shell, but shell also needs to be COMPLETE prior to CO of first tennant (at least required systems and egress)

Quick answer, but I think you get the point...
 
Don't know about the LEED angle.

I don't know how you can require them to do it all under one permit. We have multiple permit buildings all the time. Footing/foundation, core/shell, then the individual tenant finishes. Actully seems to work out best because the phases can finish up with hinging on a C of O for completion.
 
The last developement (mini-mall) that was done this way is still not complete 4 years later.
Click to expand...
1) Can I require them to to do this under 1 permit and not multiple?

Since it it a USFS building I bet it will be completed on time so I would issue the 2 permits. You may even see a slight revenue increase doing it this way depending on your fee structur (price per thousand usually drops as the valuation goes up)

2) As this is a LEED certified building, doesn't it need to be under one permit to get the LEED certification?

That's the designer/owners problem not yours.
 
Had the same problem with a project eleven years ago! The steel frame is still standing today. Terrible eyesore!
 
Coug Dad said:
USFS (US Forest Service)? If it is a Federal Building, why are they getting a permit?
Click to expand...
Private party is building the new office building to lease to USFS. Current USFS building is privately owned and leased to USFS. This is how it is done, don't know why.
 
Steveray -

We don't have the IEBC, I'm in CA. I'm sure I can get support for the one permit = entire job. We are living with the lack of landscaping and non-approved signage on the other project on Main St.

Is there a code section I can take to city council, planning, etc. requiring one permit?
 
Good point mtlogcabin, the permit fee schedule in a lot of municipalities is weighted so that the lower the vaulation the higher the permits cost!

Q. If you only issue one permit, what do you do when it expires? One extensition then what? Issue another and another? Whats the difference in a tenant building that has some bays empty?

CD, Jurisdiction on federal property?, good one! Our muni gives other taxing government agencies their permits for free and only charges for time of inspections.

pc1
 
Shell permits are done all the time.

Just require it to be closed out before issuing a CO to any of the tenant spaces.
 
fatboy said:
Don't know about the LEED angle. I don't know how you can require them to do it all under one permit. We have multiple permit buildings all the time. Footing/foundation, core/shell, then the individual tenant finishes. Actully seems to work out best because the phases can finish up with hinging on a C of O for completion.
Click to expand...
This is being built for the one tenant only, no other future tenant improvements. I guess I wasn't very clear about that. I don't even know if it could be considered a true TI.
 
We do separate Permits very often. One of the main reasons is the TI's may have a different contractor that the shell.

We issue a TCO for the shell until ALL TI's are complete, each TI gets a CO and the base building/shell gets a CO when everything is complete.

We do the same for multi-family residential, and each unit CO'd signs a release stating that they are moving into an incomplete building.

Works well here.

mj
 
Pcinspector1 said:
Good point mtlogcabin, the permit fee schedule in a lot of municipalities is weighted so that the lower the vaulation the higher the permits cost! Q. If you only issue one permit, what do you do when it expires? One extensition then what? Issue another and another? Whats the difference in a tenant building that has some bays empty?

CD, Jurisdiction on federal property?, good one! Our muni gives other taxing government agencies their permits for free and only charges for time of inspections.

pc1
Click to expand...
2 extensions as long a work is ongoing. Code says 180 days for permit and as we have weather I allow for extensions (usually residential).

As to the federal project as it is a private party who owns the land and is building the building, no break on the permit. County and City here do their own permits/inspections for their jurisdiction. I issued a permit for work on the County Courthouse Annex after the State of California took it over from the County, it was required by the state. Guess permits depend on jurisdiction/custom.
 
brudgers said:
Shell permits are done all the time.Just require it to be closed out before issuing a CO to any of the tenant spaces.
Click to expand...
I agree with brudgers. We issue two permits (shell & tenant finish) all the time. There is no CO for Building Shell, and the CO for the Tenant Finish is not issued until both permits pass final inspection. We sometimes grant landscaping extensions for weather, in which case we issue a temp CO. Not a big deal if you can track the inspections to the correct permit numbers.
 
Papio, how long is the TCO allowed for? I've got a shell bldg with four open bay's going on three years now!

pc1
 
We issue a CO for the entire building and list all tenant spaces, those spaces must be (if required by min Height and area) in a fire alarm zone, contain exit signs, pull stations, sprinklers, heat unit if needed to keep sprinklers from freezing, the occupied spaces are listed as what they are and the unoccupied spaces are listed as VACANT NO OCCUPANY ALLOWED. the building permits are CLOSED and new permits are required for any and all tenant space work
 
I don't know if I really have a code section on that one, luckily, it is my bosses policy...so I refer all questions on it to him....if it is a stand alone building with one tenant, it shouldn't be that bad....the recent one we had was a firwalled "addition" to 2 other buildings, the egress worked for the shell, but failed CPOT when the fitout came in, ended holding up CO for second accessible MOE...3 plumbers, 2 electricians, 2 GC's, 2 architects and a whole lot of miscommunications later.....got their CO about a month late...
 
Did the same thing here for the SS building. Issued a shell and a TI within days of each other. Shell was completed first and TI later.

I've got a shell bldg with four open bay's going on three years now!
Click to expand...
As for open spaces in a shell building that happens a lot also. Sometimes it's a tenant wanting to move in/or many times just get a price break from his current landlord and you wind up with the empty spaces. Best thing we ever did was not turn on power until the TI was completed.
 
sue,

issue two or more permits all the time for these type of projects. grading, foundation, shell, ti, fire sprinkler, fire alarm,and sign permits can all be seperate if the owner wants to go that way. it usually means more $$$ for the jurisdiction!
 
We do multiple permits too. It really doesn't matter if you have one or more permits, if the project is going to go bad one more permit is not going to make a difference.
 
pwood said:
sue,issue two or more permits all the time for these type of projects. grading, foundation, shell, ti, fire sprinkler, fire alarm,and sign permits can all be seperate if the owner wants to go that way. it usually means more $$$ for the jurisdiction!
Click to expand...
I am looking at more money versus gigantic headache. The mall was a fiasco in many ways, and just getting plans for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing was ah........like pulling teeth. ; ) I'm hoping that this building will go a bit differently with USFS involved and it not just being built for retail use.
 
"and just getting plans for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing was ah........like pulling teeth"

We don't issue any tenant finish permits until we have the required plans..............if they can't start, they will get what you want.

Yes, for those of you who love to point it out, we hold the permit hostage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top