Access Specialist
Registered User
Am I missing something? HSC 19952 is in reference to Places of Public Amusement?Health and Safety Code commencing with section 19952
CBC 1.9.1.2.1, 1.9.1.2.2, 1.9.1.2.3
Am I missing something? HSC 19952 is in reference to Places of Public Amusement?Health and Safety Code commencing with section 19952
CBC 1.9.1.2.1, 1.9.1.2.2, 1.9.1.2.3
I also don't see where OP discussed that this is public housing. I guess he said he cannot confirm it or not. If it's not for public use then I don't believe those CBC sections apply either. If they are public though then, yes, he does have accessibility requirements.Health and Safety Code commencing with section 19952
CBC 1.9.1.2.1, 1.9.1.2.2, 1.9.1.2.3
Oh. My mind was thinking a development, not 10 single families on the same lot, but in order for ADA and CBC 1.9.1.2 (if this is even in CA) to apply there has to be a public accommodation. If these are long term rentals and there is no leasing office then I don't see where a public accommodation is being provided. With the information provided and assuming it's long-term rentals like apartments, I do not believe the ADA applies anywhere on site. There is no requirement to make sidewalks accessible, mailboxes, etc, if Title II or Title III do not apply.Wasn't it initially stated that these were all on the same lot? Common interest development?
So, its actually not hypothetical. One of the BCOs in another Florida municipality reached out to me.Correct, this conversation started as a hypothetical. In response I said "if this were in CA" to extend the hypothetical. Some of the responses have been specifically in regards to CA requirements. Talking purely hypothetical has great potential for conversation, but can often lead down one rabbit hole or another.