• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

25 years later, ADA compliance still issue for some businesses

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,888
Location
So. CA
25 years later, ADA compliance still issue for some businesses

http://www.dothaneagle.com/news/business/years-later-ada-compliance-still-issue-for-some-businesses/article_1526053c-1c3f-11e5-9db5-e710ce9c91a5.html

Purchasing an old movie theater and locating their store there last year was probably one of the most exciting moments of Eagle Eye Outfitters co-owner Susan Anderson’s career.

As a building owner who had rented facilities twice before, Anderson said she was certain after multiple inspections by the City of Dothan, along with approved plans through the Small Business Association, that the building was as compliant as it needed to be for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.

But a letter from a law firm outlined to Anderson that the building was not in ADA compliance and that the law firm could file a federal lawsuit if she did not either settle with the firm or complete the changes.

Anderson said her business owner’s insurance covered the cost of hiring an attorney to fight the threat. She said that, fortunately, her building contractor worked with her to quickly correct the problems, such as ADA compliant adjustments to the parking lot, soap dispensers, dressing room hooks and paper towel holders.

Twenty-five years have passed since the ADA became law to eliminate discrimination against people with disabilities, but many business owners locally and throughout the state still face issues with ADA compliance relating to facility accessibility. Confusion often occurs when renovations are made to an older building that was grandfathered in before the ADA passed.

Jeff Mega, a rehab technology specialist with the Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services, said most any renovations to an older building, along with all construction of a new building, must be ADA compliant.

“Usually people with newer buildings tend to think about accessibility while building to code, more so than some older buildings that initially didn’t have to be accessible unless they made modifications,” he said.

“Our population is getting older and accessibility is going to be an issue that’s better to face now instead of later. Anything from ramps that are too steep or unsafe, or restrooms that are not easy to enter or once inside are too narrow, should be considered.”

Mega said the department offers free ADA inspections to local businesses by using a checklist for existing facilities.

An Opelika-Auburn News article said a Montgomery-based law firm, the ADA Group LLC with attorneys Landis Sexton and Tracy Birdsong, sent similar letters to the one Anderson received to at least 14 businesses in that area last year. The newspaper said the letter resulted in some business owners paying thousands of dollars in repairs in addition to a settlement of between $2,200 and $3,300 to the law firm for “client’s attorneys’ fees.”

The law firm’s “ADA” acronym stands for The Attorneys for Disabled Americans and not the Americans with Disabilities Act, according to the OA News.

Anderson said she believed a law firm inspector posed as a customer and went into the dressing rooms and public restrooms with a tape measure and took pictures. She said the non-compliance letter threatening a federal lawsuit caught her off guard, particularly because of the previous inspections. She encouraged business owners to contact their insurance company before attempting to make any changes or settle with a law firm.

“We are reasonable business owners. We want to ensure anyone can enjoy our facilities, and I do believe it is fair to ensure that anyone has access to enjoy shopping independently inside our business or any other,” she said.

“We would have appreciated a courtesy phone call or visit prior to threatening litigation. That is why we worked so quickly to resolve all the issues.
 
This brings up a good point about inspections done by public officials. They are expected to pass or fail the construction done in the building with her new or renovated yet in many cases they don't know what the requirements under the ADA are. How can they expect to inspect a facility if they don't know what the requirements of what they the criteria is? I know that it's not the inspectors job directly to inspect for ADA compliance, their jobs to only inspect for building code compliance, but business owners expect if they receive passing marks from inspectors there building meets all the requirements which in many cases it doesn't.
 
Msradell said:
This brings up a good point about inspections done by public officials. They are expected to pass or fail the construction done in the building with her new or renovated yet in many cases they don't know what the requirements under the ADA are. How can they expect to inspect a facility if they don't know what the requirements of what they the criteria is? I know that it's not the inspectors job directly to inspect for ADA compliance, their jobs to only inspect for building code compliance, but business owners expect if they receive passing marks from inspectors there building meets all the requirements which in many cases it doesn't.
Except most "public officials" do not/cannot inspect per the ADA.
 
Back
Top