Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
There are walls on all sides....no open edges. Love your analogy, or is that a metaphor?Slicing the bologna real thin....Don't miss....
Would the configuration shown be considered “ramps that change direction between runs at landings” that requires a 60”x60” landing per ADA 405.7.4?I've got (2) 6 feet long ramps either side of a landing.
The 60” deep maneuvering clearance on the pull side of the door will require a larger landing even if this isn’t considered a change in direction.Does ADA requirements apply? If so, Door swing and maneuvering clearances may affect the middle landing. (ICC A117.1-2017, Section 404.2.3.2.)
Project is in Florida. From the Florida Accessibility Code:You did not say where the project is located.
ADAS says:
View attachment 14572
California edited it as follows:
View attachment 14573
Per the ADA you do not need handrails on 1:12 slope up to six feet long.I've got (2) 6 feet long ramps either side of a landing. The ramps are at 1:12 slope and therefore do not rise more than 6". No handrails required....correct?
View attachment 14571
View attachment 14570
Good idea, thanks! Even though it looks like I can achieve a compliant arrangement with 6' feet segments on both legs, the 5% leg on the top would help. I'm restricted on length on the bottom leg. Door maneuvering clearance in yellow, ramp in green.If there’s any way to swing one or more doors inward, or to recess them, you could do a 10’ slope hall at 4.9% and then you would only need level door clearances, not ramp landing clearances.