-
Welcome to The Building Code Forum
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
907.2.9.3 Group R-2 college and university buildings.
- Thread starter Rmhill
- Start date
did you want the code section?
907.2.9.3 Group R-2 college and university buildings.
An automatic smoke detection system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.5 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units.
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms.
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either has a means of egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door opening directly to an exit.
907.2.9.3 Group R-2 college and university buildings.
An automatic smoke detection system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.5 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units.
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms.
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either has a means of egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door opening directly to an exit.
March 14--WHITEWATER -- A morning fire caused one minor injury and at least $150,000 damage at the Tri Sigma sorority house near the UW-Whitewater campus, authorities said.
The fire was reported at 10:44 a.m. Friday at 619 W. Main St., where smoke and flames were visible inside the first floor of the home. All occupants were out of the home when firefighters arrived, Whitewater fire Capt. Joe Uselding said.
One occupant was transported to Mercy Hospital and Trauma Center, Janesville, as a precaution, he said.
Smoke caused damage throughout the house, and one lower section of the house has fire damage, Uselding said.
The Whitewater police, fire and arson task force is investigating the cause, but Uselding said authorities do not believe it was arson.
Fire crews from Elkhorn, Fort Atkinson, La Grange, Janesville and Jefferson responded.
According to a news release from the Wisconsin Chapter of the National Fire Sprinkler Association, the sorority house did not have an operational fire sprinkler in place.
A state law requires all sorority and fraternity housing to have sprinkler systems installed by Jan. 1 2014. According to the release, the sorority house "did not meet the (January) deadline" to get sprinklers in operation.
Dan Gengler, a coordinator for Fire Sprinkler Association, said the Whitewater Fire Department told him Friday the sorority was in the process of installing a fire sprinkler system, but the work had not been completed prior to the fire.
Gengler said a sprinkler system could have prevented much of the damage the fire caused.
The Gazette could not reach fire department on Friday to confirm Gengler's statements.
About 25 women live in the home, but it was unknown how many were home at the time.
UW-Whitewater Office of Residence Life will provide housing for the displaced students, according to a UW-Whitewater news release. Property owner Michael Katchel was assisting the students with related needs, according to a Whitewater Police Department news release.
The Office of Academic Affairs will work with instructors to accommodate students who missed any exams or coursework. Counseling services are available at University Health and Counseling Services located in the Ambrose Health Center building and appointments may be made by calling 262-472-1305.
.
The house is near the southeast corner of the UW-Whitewater campus.
Copyright 2014 - The Janesville Gazette, Wis.
The fire was reported at 10:44 a.m. Friday at 619 W. Main St., where smoke and flames were visible inside the first floor of the home. All occupants were out of the home when firefighters arrived, Whitewater fire Capt. Joe Uselding said.
One occupant was transported to Mercy Hospital and Trauma Center, Janesville, as a precaution, he said.
Smoke caused damage throughout the house, and one lower section of the house has fire damage, Uselding said.
The Whitewater police, fire and arson task force is investigating the cause, but Uselding said authorities do not believe it was arson.
Fire crews from Elkhorn, Fort Atkinson, La Grange, Janesville and Jefferson responded.
According to a news release from the Wisconsin Chapter of the National Fire Sprinkler Association, the sorority house did not have an operational fire sprinkler in place.
A state law requires all sorority and fraternity housing to have sprinkler systems installed by Jan. 1 2014. According to the release, the sorority house "did not meet the (January) deadline" to get sprinklers in operation.
Dan Gengler, a coordinator for Fire Sprinkler Association, said the Whitewater Fire Department told him Friday the sorority was in the process of installing a fire sprinkler system, but the work had not been completed prior to the fire.
Gengler said a sprinkler system could have prevented much of the damage the fire caused.
The Gazette could not reach fire department on Friday to confirm Gengler's statements.
About 25 women live in the home, but it was unknown how many were home at the time.
UW-Whitewater Office of Residence Life will provide housing for the displaced students, according to a UW-Whitewater news release. Property owner Michael Katchel was assisting the students with related needs, according to a Whitewater Police Department news release.
The Office of Academic Affairs will work with instructors to accommodate students who missed any exams or coursework. Counseling services are available at University Health and Counseling Services located in the Ambrose Health Center building and appointments may be made by calling 262-472-1305.
.
The house is near the southeast corner of the UW-Whitewater campus.
Copyright 2014 - The Janesville Gazette, Wis.
This is an example of a monograph that I was looking for... maybe I am using the wrong work, I am looking for the proponents statement of the intent of the code during the code change hearings....
FS63–07/08
707.14.2.1
Proponent: Gregory J Cahanin, Cahanin Fire & Code Consulting, representing Smoke Safety Council
Revise as follows:
707.14.2.1 (Supp) Pressurization requirements. Elevator hoistways shall be pressurized to maintain a minimum
positive pressure of 0.04 inches of water (9.96 Pa) and a maximum positive pressure of 0.06 inches of water (14.94
Pa) with respect to adjacent occupied space on all floors as w.............Reason: Smoke control systems are complex mechanical systems that provide for a tenable environment, in this instance, in the elevator shaft for...........................
FS63–07/08
707.14.2.1
Proponent: Gregory J Cahanin, Cahanin Fire & Code Consulting, representing Smoke Safety Council
Revise as follows:
707.14.2.1 (Supp) Pressurization requirements. Elevator hoistways shall be pressurized to maintain a minimum
positive pressure of 0.04 inches of water (9.96 Pa) and a maximum positive pressure of 0.06 inches of water (14.94
Pa) with respect to adjacent occupied space on all floors as w.............Reason: Smoke control systems are complex mechanical systems that provide for a tenable environment, in this instance, in the elevator shaft for...........................
Good question!!!! for your first questionRmhill said:
Should get a few answers, just wait a day or two.
Hate to say it but may be poorly written. if the dorms are not owned directly by the college, looks like it would not apply.
good idea, but poor execution
so they leave out the rest of the R-2's:::
R-2 Residential occupancies containing sleeping units or more than two dwelling units where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature, including:
Apartment houses
Boarding houses (nontransient)
Convents
Dormitories
Fraternities and sororities
Hotels (nontransient)
Live/work units
Monasteries
Motels (nontransient)
Vacation timeshare properties
Congregate living facilities with 16 or fewer occupants are permitted to comply with the construction requirements for Group R-3.
R-2 Residential occupancies containing sleeping units or more than two dwelling units where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature, including:
Apartment houses
Boarding houses (nontransient)
Convents
Dormitories
Fraternities and sororities
Hotels (nontransient)
Live/work units
Monasteries
Motels (nontransient)
Vacation timeshare properties
Congregate living facilities with 16 or fewer occupants are permitted to comply with the construction requirements for Group R-3.
Gregg Harris
SAWHORSE
Describe the off campus building used for housing. Are the privately owned and separate entry/exits?Rmhill said:
Frank
REGISTERED
As written it would appear to only apply to college or university managed student housing.Rmhill said:
Off campus private apartments, even if marketed to students would not seem to be included. As a practical matter many of the apartment complexes near college campuses house a mix of locals, students, and exstudents.
fatboy
Administrator
cda, ICC Monograph=compilation of all the code changes proposed in any given code cycle. Used to be bound material, now is an electronic file.
georgia plans exam
Silver Member
I would say that it does not apply to "private student housing apartments off campus".
GPE
GPE
Gregg Harris
SAWHORSE
You would be looking for the ROP and the ROC Report on Proposal and Comment for a specific code yearRmhill said:
Gregg Harris
SAWHORSE
Yes they arecda said:
Frank
REGISTERED
ok here is the whole mess from ICC with links
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Pages/09-10cycle.aspx
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Documents/2009-10cycle/ProposedChanges/IFC.pdf
F109–09/10
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9), 907.2.9.3 (New) [iBC [F] 907.2.9.3 (New)]
Proponent: William Freer, Fire Protection Specialist, NYS Office of Fire Prevention and Control
1. Revise as follows:
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9) Group R-2. Fire alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-2
occupancies as required in Section 907.2.9.1 and 907.2.9.2 through 907.2.9.3.
907.2.9.3 ([F] 907.2.9.3) Group R-2 college and university buildings. An automatic smoke detection system that
activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.6 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and
university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be
interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors
serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either have a means of
egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door
opening directly to an exit.
Reason: This code change would add new requirements to the code. The current code only requires single and multiple station smoke alarms in
new R-2 student housing. Single and multiple station smoke alarms are not required to be connected to a building fire alarm which would evacuate
the building in event of a fire or smoke condition. They are also not required to be in all areas of the building which have been shown to be frequent
areas of ignition. In a study completed by the New York State Governor’s Task Force on Campus Fire Safety it was cited that 43% of fires in college
dormitories are located in dorm rooms or kitchens, leaving the other 57% to be located in areas that would not require smoke detection under the
current code. The study also showed that there were approximately 300 fires on college campus over a 3 year period while only 160 and were
reported to the Fire Department. The Center for Campus Fire Safety reports 99 deaths have been “reported” in fires in student housing since 2000.
An NFPA study on student housing showed 3,300 structural fires in Dormitories, Fraternities, Sororities and Barracks between 2002-2005. Since
1980 there has been an increase of 3% in reported fires in dormitory type occupancies, while there has been a 52% decrease in overall reported
structural fires. New York State has required Fire Alarm and detection system in new dormitories since 2003 and has not had any deaths reported
in these buildings since that change.
Cost Impact: The code change proposal will increase the cost of construction.
Public Hearing: Committee: AS AM D
Assembly: ASF AMF DF
ICCFILENAME: FREER-F2-907.2.9.DOC
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Documents/2009-10cycle/FAA/IFC_%20F2-F120.pdf
F109-09/10
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9), 907.2.9.3 (New) [iBC [F] 907.2.9.3 (New)]
Proposed Change as Submitted
Proponent: William Freer, Fire Protection Specialist, NYS Office of Fire Prevention and Control
1. Revise as follows:
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9) Group R-2. Fire alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-2
occupancies as required in Section 907.2.9.1 and 907.2.9.2 through 907.2.9.3.
2010 ICC FINAL ACTION AGENDA 893
907.2.9.3 ([F] 907.2.9.3) Group R-2 college and university buildings. An automatic smoke detection system that
activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.6 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and
university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be
interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors
serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either have a means of
egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door
opening directly to an exit.
Reason: This code change would add new requirements to the code. The current code only requires single and multiple station smoke alarms in
new R-2 student housing. Single and multiple station smoke alarms are not required to be connected to a building fire alarm which would evacuate
the building in event of a fire or smoke condition. They are also not required to be in all areas of the building which have been shown to be frequent
areas of ignition. In a study completed by the New York State Governor’s Task Force on Campus Fire Safety it was cited that 43% of fires in college
dormitories are located in dorm rooms or kitchens, leaving the other 57% to be located in areas that would not require smoke detection under the
current code. The study also showed that there were approximately 300 fires on college campus over a 3 year period while only 160 and were
reported to the Fire Department. The Center for Campus Fire Safety reports 99 deaths have been “reported” in fires in student housing since 2000.
An NFPA study on student housing showed 3,300 structural fires in Dormitories, Fraternities, Sororities and Barracks between 2002-2005. Since
1980 there has been an increase of 3% in reported fires in dormitory type occupancies, while there has been a 52% decrease in overall reported
structural fires. New York State has required Fire Alarm and detection system in new dormitories since 2003 and has not had any deaths reported
in these buildings since that change.
Cost Impact: The code change proposal will increase the cost of construction.
ICCFILENAME: FREER-F2-907.2.9.DOC
Public Hearing Results
Committee Action: Approved as Submitted
Committee Reason: The committee approved the proposal due to the unique hazards that are present in Group R-2 college and university
buildings. More specifically, there are often more common areas than found in other types of Group R-2 occupancies where occupants congregate.
Also it is not uncommon to have activities such as cooking in these common areas.
Assembly Action: None
Individual Consideration Agenda
This item is on the agenda for individual consideration because a public comment was submitted.
Public Comment:
Jeffrey Shapiro, International Code Consultants, representing National Multi Housing Council, requests
Disapproval.
Commenter=s Reason: The justification for approving this proposal failed to consider the inclusion of residential fire sprinkler systems in cited fire
statistics, and it failed to look at whether the existing requirement for manual fire alarm systems adequately addresses the need for a supplemental
evacuation warning.
Of greater concern however, is the lack of consideration for the increased number of alarms that will be associated with placing smoke
detectors in common areas and dorm rooms that will ultimately lead students to ignore the alarm system. Consider that small dorm rooms with
cooking equipment (microwaving popcorn being one example) will take very little time to fill with enough smoke to activate the alarm system.
Finally, there is a concern with respect to defining exactly what constitutes “college and university buildings.” Are these only buildings that are
owned by the school, or do they include off-campus housing. If off-campus housing is included, at what point does the tenant population’s student
percentage cause the building to differ from any other apartment building? Granted, the code already uses this text in Chapter 4 for emergency
planning, but that is a far less ominous requirement to leave vague than what is proposed here.
With all of these concerns and the lack of a comprehensive basis of justification, the proposal should be rejected.
Final Action: AS AM AMPC D
Final action was AS
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Pages/09-10cycle.aspx
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Documents/2009-10cycle/ProposedChanges/IFC.pdf
F109–09/10
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9), 907.2.9.3 (New) [iBC [F] 907.2.9.3 (New)]
Proponent: William Freer, Fire Protection Specialist, NYS Office of Fire Prevention and Control
1. Revise as follows:
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9) Group R-2. Fire alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-2
occupancies as required in Section 907.2.9.1 and 907.2.9.2 through 907.2.9.3.
907.2.9.3 ([F] 907.2.9.3) Group R-2 college and university buildings. An automatic smoke detection system that
activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.6 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and
university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be
interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors
serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either have a means of
egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door
opening directly to an exit.
Reason: This code change would add new requirements to the code. The current code only requires single and multiple station smoke alarms in
new R-2 student housing. Single and multiple station smoke alarms are not required to be connected to a building fire alarm which would evacuate
the building in event of a fire or smoke condition. They are also not required to be in all areas of the building which have been shown to be frequent
areas of ignition. In a study completed by the New York State Governor’s Task Force on Campus Fire Safety it was cited that 43% of fires in college
dormitories are located in dorm rooms or kitchens, leaving the other 57% to be located in areas that would not require smoke detection under the
current code. The study also showed that there were approximately 300 fires on college campus over a 3 year period while only 160 and were
reported to the Fire Department. The Center for Campus Fire Safety reports 99 deaths have been “reported” in fires in student housing since 2000.
An NFPA study on student housing showed 3,300 structural fires in Dormitories, Fraternities, Sororities and Barracks between 2002-2005. Since
1980 there has been an increase of 3% in reported fires in dormitory type occupancies, while there has been a 52% decrease in overall reported
structural fires. New York State has required Fire Alarm and detection system in new dormitories since 2003 and has not had any deaths reported
in these buildings since that change.
Cost Impact: The code change proposal will increase the cost of construction.
Public Hearing: Committee: AS AM D
Assembly: ASF AMF DF
ICCFILENAME: FREER-F2-907.2.9.DOC
http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/codes/Documents/2009-10cycle/FAA/IFC_%20F2-F120.pdf
F109-09/10
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9), 907.2.9.3 (New) [iBC [F] 907.2.9.3 (New)]
Proposed Change as Submitted
Proponent: William Freer, Fire Protection Specialist, NYS Office of Fire Prevention and Control
1. Revise as follows:
907.2.9 (IBC [F] 907.2.9) Group R-2. Fire alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-2
occupancies as required in Section 907.2.9.1 and 907.2.9.2 through 907.2.9.3.
2010 ICC FINAL ACTION AGENDA 893
907.2.9.3 ([F] 907.2.9.3) Group R-2 college and university buildings. An automatic smoke detection system that
activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.6 shall be installed in Group R-2 college and
university buildings in the following locations:
1. Common spaces outside of dwelling units and sleeping units
2. Laundry rooms, mechanical equipment rooms, and storage rooms
3. All interior corridors serving sleeping units or dwelling units.
Required smoke alarms in dwelling units and sleeping units in Group R-2 college and university buildings shall be
interconnected with the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72.
Exception: An automatic smoke detection system is not required in buildings that do not have interior corridors
serving sleeping units or dwelling units and where each sleeping unit or dwelling unit either have a means of
egress door opening directly to an exterior exit access that leads directly to an exit or a means of egress door
opening directly to an exit.
Reason: This code change would add new requirements to the code. The current code only requires single and multiple station smoke alarms in
new R-2 student housing. Single and multiple station smoke alarms are not required to be connected to a building fire alarm which would evacuate
the building in event of a fire or smoke condition. They are also not required to be in all areas of the building which have been shown to be frequent
areas of ignition. In a study completed by the New York State Governor’s Task Force on Campus Fire Safety it was cited that 43% of fires in college
dormitories are located in dorm rooms or kitchens, leaving the other 57% to be located in areas that would not require smoke detection under the
current code. The study also showed that there were approximately 300 fires on college campus over a 3 year period while only 160 and were
reported to the Fire Department. The Center for Campus Fire Safety reports 99 deaths have been “reported” in fires in student housing since 2000.
An NFPA study on student housing showed 3,300 structural fires in Dormitories, Fraternities, Sororities and Barracks between 2002-2005. Since
1980 there has been an increase of 3% in reported fires in dormitory type occupancies, while there has been a 52% decrease in overall reported
structural fires. New York State has required Fire Alarm and detection system in new dormitories since 2003 and has not had any deaths reported
in these buildings since that change.
Cost Impact: The code change proposal will increase the cost of construction.
ICCFILENAME: FREER-F2-907.2.9.DOC
Public Hearing Results
Committee Action: Approved as Submitted
Committee Reason: The committee approved the proposal due to the unique hazards that are present in Group R-2 college and university
buildings. More specifically, there are often more common areas than found in other types of Group R-2 occupancies where occupants congregate.
Also it is not uncommon to have activities such as cooking in these common areas.
Assembly Action: None
Individual Consideration Agenda
This item is on the agenda for individual consideration because a public comment was submitted.
Public Comment:
Jeffrey Shapiro, International Code Consultants, representing National Multi Housing Council, requests
Disapproval.
Commenter=s Reason: The justification for approving this proposal failed to consider the inclusion of residential fire sprinkler systems in cited fire
statistics, and it failed to look at whether the existing requirement for manual fire alarm systems adequately addresses the need for a supplemental
evacuation warning.
Of greater concern however, is the lack of consideration for the increased number of alarms that will be associated with placing smoke
detectors in common areas and dorm rooms that will ultimately lead students to ignore the alarm system. Consider that small dorm rooms with
cooking equipment (microwaving popcorn being one example) will take very little time to fill with enough smoke to activate the alarm system.
Finally, there is a concern with respect to defining exactly what constitutes “college and university buildings.” Are these only buildings that are
owned by the school, or do they include off-campus housing. If off-campus housing is included, at what point does the tenant population’s student
percentage cause the building to differ from any other apartment building? Granted, the code already uses this text in Chapter 4 for emergency
planning, but that is a far less ominous requirement to leave vague than what is proposed here.
With all of these concerns and the lack of a comprehensive basis of justification, the proposal should be rejected.
Final Action: AS AM AMPC D
Final action was AS
Thanks for the post
Jeff made a lot of good negative arguments including
"""Finally, there is a concern with respect to defining exactly what constitutes “college and university buildings.” Are these only buildings that are
owned by the school, or do they include off-campus housing. If off-campus housing is included, at what point does the tenant population’s student
percentage cause the building to differ from any other apartment building? Granted, the code already uses this text in Chapter 4 for emergency
planning, but that is a far less ominous requirement to leave vague than what is proposed here.""""
Jeff made a lot of good negative arguments including
"""Finally, there is a concern with respect to defining exactly what constitutes “college and university buildings.” Are these only buildings that are
owned by the school, or do they include off-campus housing. If off-campus housing is included, at what point does the tenant population’s student
percentage cause the building to differ from any other apartment building? Granted, the code already uses this text in Chapter 4 for emergency
planning, but that is a far less ominous requirement to leave vague than what is proposed here.""""