I was born in the USA and own a gun for self defense and would like to keep it that way.Jobsaver said:Those using gun-related metaphors should be shot. Only then, will we increase the caliber of our society.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I was born in the USA and own a gun for self defense and would like to keep it that way.Jobsaver said:Those using gun-related metaphors should be shot. Only then, will we increase the caliber of our society.
Yikes said:(PS. I think that term that was **** moderated above is not a sexual term, but a gun term relating to a rifle hammer.Sigh.
LOL..........................Francis Vineyard said:to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Jon on CrossfireYikes said:@brudgers - regarding the rhetoric of asassination - Many of our news / political shows (Frontline, Crossfire) have militaristic language embedded in their names, but they are not a call for violence. As far as I know the shooter in Tucson was not politically motivated enough to even vote last year, so it's hard for me to believe that a politician's rhetoric was enough to incite him to "pull the trigger" but not enough to incite him to "pull the lever" last November.
No worries.............he's in my sightsI've located the newest transgressor. We've got to stop him before he incites a whole generation of arsonists.
Or do you mean a whole generation of pot smokers?KZQuixote said:I've located the newest transgressor. We've got to stop him before he incites a whole generation of arsonists. Who couldn't ever be held responsible for their actions, cause we didn't get the aluminum foil helmets out in time.[video=youtube;vyk2-ezzE4U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyk2-ezzE4U&feature=player_embedded
Bill
Pot smokers or arsonists? Harper's words are plain enough. Do we really have enough energy to extrapolate, identify and protect every class of wackos who might find some unintended resonance in everyday speech?jar546 said:Or do you mean a whole generation of pot smokers?
That does not describe the politicians identified as "liberal" in today's newsand governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.
That's what they call being a reactionary.mtlogcabin said:I prefer to go back to classical liberalism philosophy
Even the definition has a bias. It may be viewed by some that way, but I'll fix it for them: "The perceived good of the community is at the expense of the freedom of the individual".mtlogcabin said:Under social liberalism, the good of the community is viewed as harmonious with the freedom of the individual.[I prefer to go back to classical liberalism philosophy