• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Abandoned Fire Sprinkler Heads

R

Rider Rick

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
468
California School District modernization install smoke detectors and leave abandoned fire sprinkler heads in ceilings that are disconnected from water supply.
 
Remove them!!!’

Plus who’s bright idea to remove fire sprinklers??

Moonbeam trying to save water???
 
Just one of many



901.4.5Appearance of equipment.

Any device that has the physical appearance of life safety or fire protection equipment but that does not perform that life safety or fire protection function shall be prohibited.
 
Only California

https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/PL_11-01.pdf
DSA Policy Document:
WHEN SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED:
2.1 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems: Installation of an automatic fire sprinkler system is required when all of the following conditions apply:
a) The facility serves kindergarten through 12th grade students.
b) The campus is a new campus and the plans were submitted to DSA regional offices on or after July 1, 2002.
c) The project is State funded under the Greene Act. Any amount of such funding qualifies. Private and parochial school campuses and public school campuses 100 percent funded by local funds are not required to install automatic fire sprinkler systems under the law. The provisions found in Chapter 9 of the CBC would prevail.
Note: The automatic sprinkler systems requirements apply to all buildings on a new campus, regardless of occupancy classifications. This includes, among others, assembly buildings such as gymnasiums, multipurpose rooms and auditoriums Future buildings constructed on new campuses will also be required to be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system if those buildings meet the above conditions.
The reduction in CBC and CFC requirements for automatic fire sprinkler systems, found in Chapter 5 of the CBC (i.e., area increases, height increases, reduction in rating of construction type), and reduction in fire flow (CFC Appendix B, BB, C, and CC) continue to be allowed even though the system is now required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cda
RLGA said:
What's the question?
Click to expand...


This School District has 33 school campuses 4 High Schools, 8 middle schools and 16 grammar schools 2 adult schools and Administration buildings.

Not one campus is a kindergarten through 12th grade students.

My question is that when the teachers, parents, staff and the public see sprinklers in the ceilings of school buildings we all think that there is a working fire sprinkler system that will protect us in a fire. But what we have is a fake fire sprinkler system.
 
Rider Rick said:
This School District has 33 school campuses 4 High Schools, 8 middle schools and 16 grammar schools 2 adult schools and Administration buildings.

Not one campus is a kindergarten through 12th grade students.

My question is that when the teachers, parents, staff and the public see sprinklers in the ceilings of school buildings we all think that there is a working fire sprinkler system that will protect us in a fire. But what we have is a fake fire sprinkler system.
Click to expand...
Talk to the local fire marshal.
 
Mark,

Thank you and this forum for all you help.

Mark,

I was told by a school official that there is no government official/office with Jurisdiction of Authority over the School District except the Division of State Architecture.
I laughed and said I would love to be here when you tell that to the Fire Marshal.

I contacted the California State Fire Marshal and was told the City Fire Marshal was Jurisdiction of Authority for the school district.

Two weeks ago I emailed the City Fire Marshal and he did reply that he was the Jurisdiction of Authority for the City School District. I emailed my concerns with some photos.

A few days later a Fire Inspector asked me to resend the photos, which I did.

Last Saturday I emailed the Fire Inspector that I just did a walk through of a new gymnasium at a middle school and I had some concerns with safety.

As of today I have had not had a reply.
Rick
 
Rider Rick said:
Mark,
Thank you and this forum for all you help.
Mark,
I was told by a school official that there is no government official/office with Jurisdiction of Authority over the School District except the Division of State Architecture.
I laughed and said I would love to be here when you tell that to the Fire Marshal.
I contacted the California State Fire Marshal and was told the City Fire Marshal was Jurisdiction of Authority for the school district.
Two weeks ago I emailed the City Fire Marshal and he did reply that he was the Jurisdiction of Authority for the City School District. I emailed my concerns with some photos.
A few days later a Fire Inspector asked me to resend the photos, which I did.
Last Saturday I emailed the Fire Inspector that I just did a walk through of a new gymnasium at a middle school and I had some concerns with safety.
As of today I have had not had a reply.
Rick
Click to expand...
"Almost everyone" has a boss.....
 
Rider Rick said:
Mark,

Thank you and this forum for all you help.

Mark,

I was told by a school official that there is no government official/office with Jurisdiction of Authority over the School District except the Division of State Architecture.
I laughed and said I would love to be here when you tell that to the Fire Marshal.

I contacted the California State Fire Marshal and was told the City Fire Marshal was Jurisdiction of Authority for the school district.

Two weeks ago I emailed the City Fire Marshal and he did reply that he was the Jurisdiction of Authority for the City School District. I emailed my concerns with some photos.

A few days later a Fire Inspector asked me to resend the photos, which I did.

Last Saturday I emailed the Fire Inspector that I just did a walk through of a new gymnasium at a middle school and I had some concerns with safety.

As of today I have had not had a reply.
Rick
Click to expand...


Where are you in the pecking order???

What do you do?

I would say turn in the problem to everyone you can, do not ask about jurisdiction, let them figure it out.

The section I cited should be in the calif Fire Code
 
Most of the codes cited earlier talk about when a building is built or remodeled. This building already had sprinklers and they were just Disconnected as part of a remodeling project and they were replaced with smoke detectors?? If they were recorded at one time for the building I'm sure they are still required today. This makes absolutely no sense.
 
What about travel distance, number of exits, exit width, and all of the other trade offs you get when you have sprinklers, did they make any changes to these if they removed the sprinkler system?
 
Insurance Engineer said:
What about travel distance, number of exits, exit width, and all of the other trade offs you get when you have sprinklers, did they make any changes to these if they removed the sprinkler system?
Click to expand...

No changes just disconnect from water supply and added smoke detectors. This contractor, the school board and the Department of State Architect are all not held accountable.

For now.
 
Rider Rick said:
No changes just disconnect from water supply and added smoke detectors. This contractor, the school board and the Department of State Architect are all not held accountable.

For now.
Click to expand...

Find out who the liability and fire insurance carriers are and drop a dime to them. The actual insurance carrier NOT the agent or insurance consultant, IF they are giving credit for a sprinkler system that is in fact out of service they may add additional pressure.....

I would think if the sprinkler systems were required at the time of construction and now removed without adding additional exits to cut down on travel distance someone is assuming a lot of liability.
 
I don't know which regional office is responsible for this district but each DSA regional office reviews fire sprinkler systems. Was this a design/build project?
Speak with the Field Supervisor for Field Engineers of that office and voice your concerns.
 
Rider Rick said:
My question is that when the teachers, parents, staff and the public see sprinklers in the ceilings of school buildings we all think that there is a working fire sprinkler system that will protect us in a fire. But what we have is a fake fire sprinkler system.
Click to expand...

I too think that way when looking at the ceiling with sprinkler heads and for a way out, why would any body think differently?

Not good...not good
 
ADAguy said:
I don't know which regional office is responsible for this district but each DSA regional office reviews fire sprinkler systems. Was this a design/build project?
Speak with the Field Supervisor for Field Engineers of that office and voice your concerns.
Click to expand...

These are the fire sprinklers that were designed and built in the schools in the1960's and now these schools are undergoing modernization. The sprinkler heads are left in the ceiling disconnected from the water supply and replaced with new smoke detectors, it makes no sense.
When I ask about fire doors being modified in the field or cut in half to make a dutch door in a gym corridor. I'm told they might not need fire doors in the gym anymore because of the new smoke detectors.
It's crazy.
 
Rider Rick said:
These are the fire sprinklers that were designed and built in the schools in the1960's and now these schools are undergoing modernization. The sprinkler heads are left in the ceiling disconnected from the water supply and replaced with new smoke detectors, it makes no sense.
When I ask about fire doors being modified in the field or cut in half to make a dutch door in a gym corridor. I'm told they might not need fire doors in the gym anymore because of the new smoke detectors.
It's crazy.
Click to expand...
They might not need them? I would think they should be damn sure before they go removing any type of fire protection that's already in place. I could maybe understand that needing as many fire doors if you were installing a sprinkler system but you removed one. I sure hope they have everything well documented if I ever have a fire and somebody gets hurt or even worse killed.
 
Don't be so sure! This is another example of Districts overstepping their authority and exposing students to future danger.
Contact local FD?
 
ADAguy said:
Don't be so sure! This is another example of Districts overstepping their authority and exposing students to future danger.
Contact local FD?
Click to expand...

Well if the state has taken away the power not much fd can do
 
As first responders they conduct annual inspections and should take this up with State architect, no?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top