• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Accessibility for apartments over commercial in a small 2 story building

thomasfagan

REGISTERED
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
8
Location
oregon
I am designing a small two story, 10000sf mixed use project. Desired program is 5000sf ground level commercial, 5000sf 2nd level residential.

My understanding is if we break the residential up into 3 or less apartments, then none of them would need to be accessible units, and we would not need an accessible route to the 2nd level. If we break them up into 4 or more units then all of chapter 11 would apply and we would need to provide an accessible route to all units on the 2nd level. Did I get this right?
 
1. Where is the project based (so we know the applicable code)?
2. If this a new building, or renovation of an existing building?
3. Are these private dwelling units, or are you getting funding for them form a public source?
 
1. Where is the project based (so we know the applicable code)?
2. If this a new building, or renovation of an existing building?
3. Are these private dwelling units, or are you getting funding for them form a public source?
Oregon. 2022 OSSC which is based on 2021 IBC
New building
Privately funded.

Thanks!
 
It appears that 1108.6.2.2.2 covers "four or more dwelling units", which mirrors the language of the Federal Fair Housing Act.
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/PDF/FAIRHOUSING/fairfull.pdf

Here in California, that scope was changed to apartment developments with 3 or more dwellings (such as yours), or condo developments with 4 or more dwellings. That's why it's helpful to clarify the project's location.

Back to your original question: yes you generally got it right. There are a few obscure exceptions, for example:
If the apartments above are dedicated employee housing for the occupancy below, such that living in the apartment above is a necessary condition of employment on the first floor (caretaker's house, a firehouse, etc.), then the residence is actually part of the place of employment and subject to Title II of ADA.
 
Back
Top