• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

ADA in Dental

Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
1,554
Location
Miami Fla
I'm doing patient care areas in a County Health Dept. Outside of the patient care rooms are X-rays exposure buttons. Detail shows them at 60" AFF. Ramvac control buttons also at 60". Cool?
 
I'll fish..........

I don't think that this is part of an accessable route, so height limitations don't play in. The highest button on a soda vending machine is more than what is required for accessability. Now, if they hired someone that it did become an issue, then reasonable accomodations would kick in I suppose. JMHO
 
chris kennedy said:
I'm doing patient care areas in a County Health Dept. Outside of the patient care rooms are X-rays exposure buttons. Detail shows them at 60" AFF. Ramvac control buttons also at 60". Cool?
Worker controls? If yes, Okay unless there is a disabled worker Or a worker becomes disabled. If there is a disabled worker the controls need to be 48 inches maximum [resonable accomidations]

To avoid a potential problem in the future, they "should" mount it at 48 inches maximum
 
mark handler said:
Worker controls? If yes, Okay unless there is a disabled worker Or a worker becomes disabled. If there is a disabled worker the controls need to be 48 inches maximum [resonable accomidations]To avoid a potential problem in the future, they "should" mount it at 48 inches maximum
I agree, there is no violation at 60" AFF, but the building owner/employer is taking a risk if they hire someone with a disability OR if they don't hire someone because it can be construed that they don't hire the physically challenged because their workspace is not ADA friendly.
 
I believe the accessible standards also are meant to apply to those who may not be as tall as the general public, so a lower height is accessible to all, including those disabled.
 
Awareness, Don, you have got it right.

Heights and reach ranges are intended to assist a "range' of individuals.
 
steveray said:
They will say something about kids playing with it and have you put it at 60"..
You can always install a lockable cover similar to what they use over thermostats to keep the kids from playing with it, then again how many kids are running loose in a dental office?
 
DonaldsonR said:
I believe the accessible standards also are meant to apply to those who may not be as tall as the general public, so a lower height is accessible to all, including those disabled.
Guess we should be looking more closely at knox box installation for those vertically challenge fireman
 
mtlogcabin said:
Guess we should be looking more closely at knox box installation for those vertically challenge fireman
That's what they have ladders for

Most in this area are 7 feet abv the ground, , even an average height person can have difficulties with that
 
Back
Top